User talk:Status quo not acceptable
Login successful From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikipedia, Status quo not acceptable! Your user account has been created.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia collaboratively written by many of its readers. Its sheer size means it's easy to get lost, so here are some pages to help you along. To learn about Wikipedia, see the index to our help pages. To customize the site's appearance and other options, change your preferences. For more information, consult some frequently asked questions. You can test your edits in the sandbox.
Don't forget to sign your posts on talk pages by typing Status quo not acceptable (talk) 18:25, 19 May 2009 (UTC), but don't sign encyclopedic articles.
Of course, you can't be expected to know all the policies and guidelines immediately, but you should still aim to learn the vital ones (neutral point of view, cite your sources to make articles verifiable, notability criteria and the manual of style) as soon as possible.
You are welcome to upload and insert images in articles, but it is imperative you follow the strict image use policy and respect the rights of the image's creator. If you have any questions, don't be afraid to ask them: Wikipedia:Questions tells you the most appropriate place to post them. If you still need help, you can place helpme at the bottom of your talkpage with a question.
Go to the Introduction and learn the basics about Wikipedia >> Logging you in to Wikimedia's other projects: (what's this?)
Return to Main Page.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:UserLogin"
 | Hello, you used the {{helpme}} tag but you did not post a question. Please write out your question and when you are done, place back the tag. I or someone else will be along to help. Alternatively, you can join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. (Click here for instant access). |
Please use edit summaries
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Uncia (talk) 01:28, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Nirmala B. Limaye
[edit]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Nirmala B. Limaye. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nirmala B. Limaye. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of H. S. Gopalakrishna
[edit]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is H. S. Gopalakrishna. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. S. Gopalakrishna. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
The article V. J. Havel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Poorly-sourced BLP with questionable notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jared Preston (talk) 18:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The article R. P. Gupta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Citation counts are in the double digits only. Single decent reference is passing at best. Been on the cat:nn list for 10+ years and never been updated. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NPROF, WP:BIO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creepTalk 10:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of R. P. Gupta for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. P. Gupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.