User talk:Staticj

Image:Nicole Wray Changes.JPG

Are you sure that this is the real album cover? It looks distinctly homemade to me - something that could be knocked up in Paintshop Pro in about 30 seconds by adding text to an existing photo. Where did you find it exactly? --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 20:19, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged this image for deletion for not having a source because "Proboards and Yahoonot recommended" is not a valid source. --Geniac (talk) 13:13, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was found in a Yahoo Group and appear in the result of finding a cover. But you can delete it if you want. I don't mind. Staticj (talk) 21:13, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Knowles image

According to the licensing information (which you can see if you double-click on the image), the photographer posted it to Flickr, and filled out a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 license when he did so. That license gives Wikipedia permission to use it. For biography articles, we can only use pictures that the photographer gives us permission to use.
Kww (talk) 22:33, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Nicole Wray.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicole Wray.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? (ESkog)^(Talk) 23:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Nicole peforming Girlfriend.JPG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicole peforming Girlfriend.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? (ESkog)^(Talk) 23:12, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Soccermeko (talk • contribs • block log • creation log). As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

--Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:53, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing A Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Staticj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had nothing to do with what your talking about. If you didn't want a page editted, then you should have protected it. As for being a puppet of Soccermeko, I don't know who that is. What I do know is, I came to this website to try and correct wrong information. Now for further proof, your going to have to tell what I need to do like (photos, email, etc.)Staticj (talk) 03:07, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser has confirmed that you are a sock of banned user Soccermeko — Kevin (talk) 05:29, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to the admin who responds to this request. This user is currently the subject of an open checkuser case: See: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Soccermeko. You may want to wait the results of the checkuser before acting. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:29, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]