User talk:State of Love and Trust

Transsexuality in Iran editing issues

hi, I reported the anon ID for 3RR rule as it seemed like they had at least violated that. Don't let the anonymous editors get you down as sometimes they have a valid point and aren't simply vandalizing. In the case of the Transsexuality in Iran it might help to clarify when the person transitioned so it's clearer to the general reader this person was considered a man but now they are a woman. Sometimes we have to spell this out and despite our wishes sexuality and gender issues are still stigmatized and very confusing to understand when folks have been taught otherwise. Benjiboi 22:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, OK both pages seem like they are protected, I'm willing to help a bit, let's make some constructive good faith edits to take advantage of the breathing room and improve both articles in some meaningful ways. If you could post some ideas on either of the articles talk pages I'd love to see both articles get a bump up in content so we can see improvements and maybe by example show that anon editor would constructive edits can be! Benjiboi 01:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Not sure how it happened, but I reverted contrary to my intention (I incorrectly undid a correcting revert). Honest thanks for catching my egregious error, and be well! -- User:RyanFreisling @ 16:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hello State of Love and Trust, I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Acalamari 01:53, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for catching my revert error on Mike Tyson. --DreamsAreMadeOf (talk) 19:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Max Headroom

Then why not go ahead and add that in instead? Whatever he said, it definitely requires a mention and not a shitty blank space. 98.211.215.37 (talk) 00:36, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The glove came out of a recycling bin on the floor, the same place where the Pepsi can came from. "That's what you get for 'recycled'!..." Is just an off-handed remark like the others, not a statement or commentary on recycling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.225.122.38 (talk) 01:39, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New userbox!

Hi there GameFAQer, I made this userbox!

G

This user is a member of GameFAQs.

You can add it to your userpage by simply adding this {{User:UBX/Gamefaqs}} --Lorson (talk) 19:16, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, State of Love and Trust. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]