User talk:StatGraphs

Welcome!

Hello, StatGraphs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Best Regards, Signature ^brendelHAPPY HOLIDAYS 03:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hi, I see you're living up to your username ;-). Thanks for this great graph! It really makes for nice addition to my Household income article. Regards, Signature ^brendelHAPPY HOLIDAYS 03:22, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Signature ^brendelHAPPY HOLIDAYS 03:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Happy Holidays to you too. StatGraphs 04:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BC and Vancouver

Thanks for the pie charts you added to the British Columbia and Vancouver articles. I assume the data is from the 2001 census, and just wanted to confirm that the charts use their categories and numbers. Not a big deal, but I have seen some haggling over whether or not to treat Stats Can as the final word (although that's the default in lieu of consensus anyway). Thanks, Bobanny 21:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the data is from Stat Can. [1] StatGraphs 22:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you have taken the data published by Statscan for the group "all others" and published it as the data for a group you call "White". This is presumptuous and incorrect. Please amend your graphs to only use the terminology used by Statscan. It would also be good practice to provide the sources for your data on the image description pages. heqs 23:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

StatsCan says that non-minorities consist of whites and aboriginals. [2] Is it okay if I change it from "White" to "White and Aboriginal"? StatGraphs 05:29, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do something about your graphs. Aboriginals should not be included under white! -- Earl Andrew - talk 00:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really like your graphs. But I also think that despite the fact that aboriginals are not considered a visible minority, it is still inappropriate to group them under white. Basser g 00:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:UNICEF 2006 Education for All.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:UNICEF 2006 Education for All.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Visible Minorities of Scarborough.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Visible Minorities of Scarborough.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Visible Minorities of Scarborough.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gary King (talk) 06:09, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Religion in Scarborough.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Religion in Scarborough.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Religion in Scarborough.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gary King (talk) 06:10, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graph request

I'm wondering if you could create a version of this graph:

where the y-axis is percent of racial population instead of absolute numbers. This would give a better idea of how personal income is distributed between races. (So, basically, just divide the y values by each race's total population, and regraph). I think this would be a useful addition to the Personal income in the United States page. Thanks! FusionKnight (talk) 19:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Religion in Canada 2007.png

The file File:Religion in Canada 2007.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, dated, no information about source of data

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]