User talk:Starwar25

References

It looks like you've provided plenty of references for the Artur Balder article. I've removed the tag there.
The Curdy (character) article still needs to have sources provided that aren't affiliated with the subject of the article. --Onorem♠Dil 11:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of being about the author or books, the references for the Curdy article should be about the character specifically. I don't know Spanish well enough anymore to translate the references you provided, so I'm not sure if any of them discussed the character.

Also, on that note, it would be better for both articles if you could find some references that were in English. --Onorem♠Dil 11:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Artur Balder

Why has the Artur Balder page been translated into about 50 other languages? He isn't so famous, and you created the page...Who translated the article into all those languages? Was it you putting the text through a translating website? --Montchav 15:38, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Curdy (character)

I've added other comments to the discussion page. There are a number of issues, and if I had any single thing to note, it would be that it would be better for someone unfamiliar with English and/or English Wiki not to create so many articles that need much editorial assistance. It's a lot of work for them, and it cannot be any fun to have to revise your own work so much.

And, in line with the comments above from other editors, from the lack of other articles citing this, and there being largely one writer/editor, though the article's been posted for 8 months, this may be a WP:CONFLICT issue. A certain amount of personal motives can be assumed for many Wiki pages, but the idea is to let other people speak when it concerns your own accomplishments/those of your publishing house, etc.

24.130.9.210 (talk) 17:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Curdy

An article that you have been involved in editing, Curdy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curdy. Thank you. Orland (talk) 11:34, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Curdy

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Curdy, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Curdy has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Curdy, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Artur Balder for deletion

The article Artur Balder is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artur Balder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mkativerata (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Artur Balder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artur Balder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artur Balder (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Savh ^{tell me} 23:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Artur Balder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artur Balder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artur Balder (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Savh ^{tell me} 16:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Artur Balder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artur Balder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artur Balder (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Savh ^{tell me} 08:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]