User talk:Starman005

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ray, Goodman & Brown has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://www.myspace.com/raygoodmanandbrownthemoments) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 07:23, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Criss-cross may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[Criss Cross (film 2001) )|''Criss Cross'']], a 2001 film starring Rob Stewart and Carolyn Dunn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Leuren Moret

A tag has been placed on Leuren Moret requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 911: In Plane Site, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Lewis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your !vote at an AfD

I'm going to ask you what I've asked others, have you read WP:MOVIE and if so could you please be more specific at the AfD about the policy and guideline criteria that you think the video meets? Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 07:10, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Wake Up Call. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

Be familiar with the guidelines and style
Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
- Only add a "red link" if used in an article, and include the "blue link" to that article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 07:17, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ari Sorko-Ram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sweating Bullets (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rima Laibow

Starman005, please when you have time have a look at what's happening on the Rima Laibow page. Thankyou. (Boss Reality (talk) 23:13, 25 June 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks, I'll check it out. (Starman005 (talk) 06:36, 28 June 2014 (UTC))[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rima Laibow may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:06, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I really don't think that you understand what you mean by notability and our criteria for notabilty for people. I'm assuming that you are interested in improving your understanding of how Wikiipedia works. Dougweller (talk) 07:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rima Laibow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Barbara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ari Sorko-Ram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Criss Cross. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-depleted uranium weapons activism

Wanted to let you know I brought this up at WP:FTN. As I've tried to explain, you don't understand our policies and guidelines. I hope you weren't aware of some neo-nazi connections of some of the people you mentioned. Search for Doug Rokke and neo-nazi, see [1], etc. Dougweller (talk) 13:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Starman005, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Dave vonKleist has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. From [2] Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 16:48, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dave vonKleist for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dave vonKleist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave vonKleist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 17:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 06:25, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NLT. Dougweller (talk) 07:18, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Seddon ^talk 11:58, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Starman005 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Starman005 (talk) 05:59, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: only one active unblock request at a time please. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:05, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Starman005 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here - OK, Well first of all I'm surprised that it has come to this. How ? Why ? I haven't made any legal threat. I've actually made a warning to Dougweller about his outrageous behavior. Nothing more. Yes I said I'd contact Mr vonKleist. I did so incase he wants to contact the Wikipedia owners so they can chastise Dougweller. I haven't made any threat. I said that "This is now possibly a violation of Wikipedia policy and certainly grounds to alert Mr von Kliest of this so he can seek some legal advice." That would be for him to do. I wouldn't even suggest that to Mr vonKleist. But he has a right to contact the owners of Wikipedia if there are incorrect suggestions of him having relationships with Nazis. What's wrong with that? If the nazi suggestion isn't bad enough, what would happen if the word pedophile were swapped with nazi??? Either way dirt sticks and the innocent have a hell of a job trying to clear their name when an online rumor starts.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave vonKleist with the changed edit by Dougweller
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dave_vonKleist

Now when I saw this by Dougweller below it made me feel ill. Dougweller goes over every link with a fine tooth comb when he's nominated it for deletion. But here he is supposedly that careless. How come ? Are we expected to believe that this was just a mere oversight? So this is what Dougweller said below

"Funny he hasn'e linked any of the websites that mention his relationships with neo-Nazis and other far-righters. Something that several of these biographies (eg his wife) have in common. Dougweller (talk) 15:27, 11 August 2014 (UTC)" http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FDave_vonKleist&diff=620781757&oldid=620756904

Still at the time feeling shocked and disgusted ,I replied with the below

:* Comment & Reply to Dougweller, you said "hasn'e linked any of the websites that mention his relationships with neo-Nazis". This is the firsdt that I have heard of anything to do with Neo Nazis andd I have researched von Kleist. What I see here is a childish attempt to do something untoward. This is now possibly a violation of Wikipedia policy and certainly grounds to alert Mr von Kliest of this so he can seek some legal advice. I'm disgusted that you'd try this on and you are supposed to be an administrator. I'll make sure that Mr von Kleist knows of this just in case he wants to act on it. (Starman005 (talk) 06:11, 13 August 2014 (UTC)) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FDave_vonKleist&diff=621018813&oldid=621018331[reply]

Now I'll say this again. I believe that what Dougweller has done is a violation of Wikipedia policy. It could be grounds for Mr vonKleist to seek legal advice. Ofcourse it could be. As I said that would be up to him. My saying that Mr vonKleist can act is thaty he can contact the owners here. I do hope that he will. Now following up on a lead shown to me I know that Dougweller has thrown that nazi tag around before and it's to do with somethinfg else that he's involved with in deletion process. Here's an example below - On the Fringe theories notice board Dougweller said of the film Beyond Treason

"Yes. This article is clearly fringe - it's all about a fringe view about a global conspiracy and pushes fringe people with neo-Nazi connections. Dougweller (talk) 06:38, 4 August 2014 (UTC)"

I've seen the film myself and there's nothing in the slightest "nazi" about it.

Looking at the Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard: Revision as of 17:46, 7 August 2014

Section: Anti-depleted uranium weapons activism - truthers etc. he says -

"And now I've found Dave vonKleist who sounds like a very unpleasant person (well, not in his article but then his article barely scratches the surface). An academic source for his article:[10]And [11] Those are about his "truther" leanings. The nastier side of him and Joyce Riley are mentioned at [12] And we have American Gulf War Veterans Association which sounds innocuous until you look at their website[American Gulf War Veterans Association]. Dougweller (talk) 19:55, 3 August 2014 (UTC)"
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AFringe_theories%2FNoticeboard&diff=620262644&oldid=620170437

Fair enough if an editor disagrees with the politcal stance of the person that the article is about. And in someways it's understandable that the actions gets influenced by their own emotions and beleifs and they decide to have material deleted because of that, but character assaianation is the worst kind of behavior and not to be encouraged. I'm just speak my mind. If you don't want me to speak out like I have done then I won't again. But I need a path to contact someone here if this happens again. Thanks Starman005 (talk) 05:59, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is very much intended to cause a chilling effect through the implied threat of legal action. This falls under Wikipedia's defition of a legal threat, and as such you must remain blocked while the threat/'warning' remains unrescinded. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:08, 16 August 2014 (UTC) The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:08, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Palm Island Mens Group

The article Palm Island Mens Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about non notable organisation created by sockpuppet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 23:07, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]