User talk:Starinthemirror
September 2024
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mike Ramone, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 16:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- This is your final warning. If you persist in disrupting Wikipedia, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wait, what? I'm confused as to why you reverted all the edits about @Notwally removing content from three different articles over the past week. We're talking more than 10 reverts, and there wasn't even any explanation or discussion on the talk pages. How does that make sense? Starinthemirror (talk) 16:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- You are (supposedly) a brand new editor. Your first edit was to Notwally's Talk page. You used a standard first-level warning about their removal of information from Mike Ramone "without explanation". No diff was provided for Notwally's edit. It couldn't be related to your edits of Ramone because they occurred after your warning. Those edits were unconstructive because they were unsourced/unreliably sourced. I reverted those for that reason (see my first warning). Then, you returned to your crusade against Notwally by filing a report about them at ANI. This is not constructive behavior for any user, let alone a new one.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Mate, why are you reverting and then restoring my edits? It doesn’t make any sense, and you’re acting a bit weird. I’ve got every right to report this at ANI, and you’ve no right to just delete my report without even bothering to explain. That’s just not on – totally unacceptable behaviour. My edits occurred seconds or few minutes after the warning. Starinthemirror (talk) 16:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- You are (supposedly) a brand new editor. Your first edit was to Notwally's Talk page. You used a standard first-level warning about their removal of information from Mike Ramone "without explanation". No diff was provided for Notwally's edit. It couldn't be related to your edits of Ramone because they occurred after your warning. Those edits were unconstructive because they were unsourced/unreliably sourced. I reverted those for that reason (see my first warning). Then, you returned to your crusade against Notwally by filing a report about them at ANI. This is not constructive behavior for any user, let alone a new one.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- And seriously, stop acting like you own Wikipedia with this "final warning" stuff before a welcome message. Mate, we're all here to contribute for the good, no need for the massive ego you’re throwing around. You’re just an editor like I am. We’re the same. Starinthemirror (talk) 16:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wait, what? I'm confused as to why you reverted all the edits about @Notwally removing content from three different articles over the past week. We're talking more than 10 reverts, and there wasn't even any explanation or discussion on the talk pages. How does that make sense? Starinthemirror (talk) 16:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 18:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)