User talk:Starfleet Academy/Archives/2012/February
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Starfleet Academy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello Starfleet Academy!
Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Community Portal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- How to edit a page
- Tutorial
- Copyrights
Don't worry too much about being perfect. Everyone makes mistakes, but you can click here to see how you can avoid making some common ones.
If you are still stuck, you can type {{helpme}}
on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Or, you can join the newcomer's help chat room, where volunteers can answer your questions.
If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user, such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again, welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to be BOLD! – Happysailor (talk)
Talkback
Message added 14:55, 13 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
Message added 17:33, 14 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
causa sui (talk) 17:33, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
re:Deletion of User:H.Sadar Ali Akhter Ali
Hello Starfleet Academy. I replied at User_talk:Vejvančický#Deletion_of_User:H.Sadar_Ali_Akhter_Ali. Happy editing :) --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 06:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
AC Cobra
Are you serious? That's completely inappropriate. Supplying an engine is unequivocally not the same as being a manufacturer of a particular car. Look up AC Ace, or DeTomaso Mangusta, or Lotus Europa, or any other car that used an engine supplied by a third party. I trust you'll be responsible enough to change this back, rather than wasting any more of my time. --Jelliott4 (talk) 10:13, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
I do apologize if I posted my previous message in the wrong place. But please read what I wrote, rather than writing it off as a "non-constructive attack," and think about this: Ford engines were used in the AC Ace (later ones), De Tomaso Mangusta, and Lotus Europa (later ones), and none of those Wikipedia articles cite Ford as a manufacturer of the car. Did you look up any of those examples the first time I mentioned them? (That wasn't a "non-constructive attack," that was me providing examples illustrating why what you're doing is completely inappropriate and inconsistent with analogous articles on Wikipedia.) If you need more examples, see DeLorean DMC-12, De Tomaso Pantera, Iso Grifo, Jensen-Healey, Panoz Esperante, or Sunbeam Tiger; the manufacturers of all of those cars bought engines from someone else, just like AC bought engines from Ford and Bristol, but none of those Wikipedia articles list more than one company as the manufacturer of the car. You should also be aware that this isn't just a Wikipedia convention you're violating; it's been the standard in the automotive industry and among automotive journalists and historians ever since the automobile was invented. Making the engine used in a particular car doesn't make a you a manufacturer of the car. Even racing cars that are colloquially referred to with the name of the engine supplier (e.g. Tyrrell-Ford, Williams-Renault) do not have the engine supplier listed as a constructor of the car in their Wikipedia entries (see Tyrrell 003). What else can I possibly say to explain the inconsistency you've introduced into the AC Cobra article? Jelliott4 (talk) 18:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
351 M-code
The Ford 335 engine segment lists the 351 M-code and 351 CJ, where it says that the 351 CJ was introduced in May 1971. The 351 CJ replaced the 351 M-code because the 351 M-code was a high compression engine at ~11:1, while the 351 CJ was a low compression engine. In other words, Ford Motors were changing their engine to comply with the need to run on regular gas. As a result, the 351 M-code was discontinued and the 351 CJ was introduced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.175.6.119 (talk) 17:14, 11 December 2011 (UTC)