User talk:Staos

Welcome!

Hello, Staos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Or, welcome back, I guess. Two years is a long wikivacation. --DLand ^TALK 03:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of GNAA Members

Don't even try that again. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VAndalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:Mvpimp08‎. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

{{unblock-auto|1=216.145.226.38|2= CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address has been used abusively; the address has been blocked temporarily or permanently to prevent further abuse. If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please post <nowiki>{{unblock}} on your talk page, with a note referencing this message. Please be sure to include the IP address (which should appear at the bottom of the block message).Administrators should not undo any block that is specifically called a "Checkuser" block. Period. The Checkuser knows something that you don't. If the unblock template goes up you need to ask the Checkuser why the block is there. The Checkuser might not tell you, but they will review the situation and decide whether the block can be lifted. It may not be obvious why that block is in place, but there is a reason.[2] (see: block log • current autoblocks)|3=Essjay}}</nowiki>

Why would you ever expect to be unblocked with comments like this: [1]? Part Deux 18:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed; autoblock no longer applies, you are now blocked personally indefinitely for personal attacks etc. REDVERS ↔ SЯEVDEЯ 19:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But I wasn't blocked before, I am autoblocked due to being on public wifi in a hotel, and now I'm permanently blocked due to stupid things I've been warned for? WTF? --Staos 21:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Staos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

on hotel WiFi which is blocked

Decline reason:

You are blocked for personal attacks. Please address that instead of futilely blaming your hotel IP. — ²¹⁰physicq (c) 04:21, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Staos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

on hotel WiFi which is blocked

Decline reason:

read that block log again: you were blocked indefinitely for vandalism. — Natalie 22:41, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Staos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No, I wasn't. I was autoblocked for being on shared WiFi, THEN when I contested this, I was blocked indefinately due to past stupid things I've been warned for. I was NEVER blocked before this.

Decline reason:

It appears hard to understand, but you are now permanently blocked for this. End of discussion. — Sandstein 04:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.