User talk:Stanovc

Welcome...

Hello, Stanovc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Mario1987 21:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Sharr Mountains. Luboten 2,498m, Tumba 2,346m, Maja e Livadhit 2,497, Gotushuva, Shtërpca and Brezovica Village.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Sharr Mountains. Luboten 2,498m, Tumba 2,346m, Maja e Livadhit 2,497, Gotushuva, Shtërpca and Brezovica Village.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stifle (talk) 15:02, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Lake Jazhinca in the Sharr Mountains. On an elevation of 2,180m it has a length of 150m and a width of 90m.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lake Jazhinca in the Sharr Mountains. On an elevation of 2,180m it has a length of 150m and a width of 90m.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Stifle (talk) 15:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image has been kept. —Bkell (talk) 04:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:High Kopaonik mountains near Bajgora and Kaçanolla.Maja e Mprehtë 1,789m is in the far left.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:High Kopaonik mountains near Bajgora and Kaçanolla.Maja e Mprehtë 1,789m is in the far left.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Hello. I am glad that you are big contributor to the Wikipedia, but me and few more editors want to inform you that you can not write any more Albanian names in the Kosovo articles, as you did here, here, and here. This is big violation of the wiki rules. We ask from you to fix your errors, and maintain NPOV, or you will be banned from editing. Pictures you add here must be in English, with other important languages below. So, please, with textual edits, upload new pictures with correct markings, and i will tag old ones for the speedy delete. I am waiting for your answer, and after that, we will tell you what is next for you to fix. It is not hard to make Wikipedia great! :)

All best, Tadija (talk) 22:07, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Rugova has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 18:48, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rkgova

A tag has been placed on Rkgova requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 19:05, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hyllus the Illyrian

Don't remove the deletion template again please.Megistias (talk) 12:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Illyria

Please dont add a template like this one diff. There is no 14th century as so on Illyria and no capital as it was not a single unified entity.Megistias (talk) 12:39, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Illyria, you will be blocked from editing. Megistias (talk) 07:59, 14 March 2010 (UTC) (please stop)[reply]

Megistias, bullying like this the newcomers goes against wikipedia policy. Read Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. Stanovc, thank you for your contributions. The template that you added on my opinion can be protected and instead of saying "President" we could say "King". Illyria had a capital. --sulmues talk contributions 12:29, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mireseerdhe

Welcome to the English Project of Wikipedia. Given your interest in Albanian related topics, please consider reviewing the Albanian Task Force and its discussion page here Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albania. Also please feel free to add your name to the list of active members. Thank you again for your contributions and please let me know if you need any help with your editing, by dropping a line on my talk page. --sulmues talk contributions 12:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could I please add something. Please reference everything that you write, otherwise, we'll lose the contributions that you will add pretty soon. That's the way the English Wikipedia works. --Sulmues _talk 15:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stanvoc

Hi Stanovc, how is it going?

Thanks a lot for your contribution to Albanian and Kosovo related articles; you have done a great job.

I saw that you blanked the article of Small Korab; do you think that it's the same as Small Korab Gate? If yes, then we need to request a deletion of the articles because blanking won't do the job (probably a recent changes patroller will revert you.).

Thank you. — Kedaditalk 13:28, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		For the very good work in adding geography articles, my personal recognition and respect. Thank you and let this be the first of many future barnstars!Sulmues ^(talk) 06:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Since despite warnings both here and on Commons you have continued to upload images in violation of copyright on Commons and inserted them here, you are now indefinitely blocked. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:57, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stanovc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know my guilt very well and I have only now remembered the password of my old user page 'Stanovc'. If you could just give me another chance because the only reason I created the sockpuppets was because I was desperate and I didn't know what else to do. I really regret doing this type of action. However the only reason I had problems with my old Stanovc page was bacause I was downloading photos without giving a source or permission(licence) and it was not at all to do with editing the text on articles. I wish you from the bottom of my heart to please unblock my page. If you want to ask more please do but please make it as soon as possible. Bye!

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 14:52, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stanovc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok I know why I am blocked and I agree that what I did was wrong. I will no longer cause damage to articles in Wikipedia and in the future I will only edit articles which are constructive. Therefore I no longer need to be blocked.

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time, please (yes, I'm aware you had technical issues, but as soon as you got it right you should have limited it to one. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:58, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stanovc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What else do I have to do to deserve to be unbocked, I have carried every puropse, this is indeed fustrating as I think its very unfair to me

Decline reason:

Since you have another account now, request to unblock denied as moot. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorry, there was a technical mistake in how you inserted your renewed unblock request, so it was probably not seen by any administrator. I see you created Whatelsetodo (talk · contribs) in the meantime, I suppose out of frustration that your unblock request had no response. I'll leave the request on for others to review, but note that I have the impression your (sock) edits in the meantime have largely been positive. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]