User talk:Stanleycosgrovejr

This is Stanleycosgrovejr's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugenio Zuccarelli (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eugenio Zuccarelli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 06:09, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stanleycosgrovejr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 06:09, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello Stanleycosgrovejr. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Stanleycosgrovejr. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Stanleycosgrovejr|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note, it was very much appreciated. I went ahead and confirmed I do not hold any COI nor am receiving compensation. Stanleycosgrovejr (talk) 01:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know if anything else is needed on my end. Thank you. Stanleycosgrovejr (talk) 16:59, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain how this is your own work then. PICKLEDICAE🥒 18:17, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As with most personalities, the main website of this biography has a mediakit. I just downloaded the mediakit and uploaded the photo that looked most suited for Wikipedia. (https://eugeniozuccarelli.com/mediakit/). Happy to answer any other questions. Stanleycosgrovejr (talk) 23:50, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(After having given it a better description). Stanleycosgrovejr (talk) 23:52, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I better understood the comment about "own work", so following the process I went through, I changed the Source to be the copyright holder of the photo coming from the mediakit which seems to be the photographer. Thank you for all your great feedback. Stanleycosgrovejr (talk) 12:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I swapped the main image with one found on the mediakit that has open license. Draft:Eugenio_Zuccarelli should now be ready for review. Stanleycosgrovejr (talk) 13:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Eugenio Zuccarelli has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Eugenio Zuccarelli. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 21:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugenio Zuccarelli (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most references which cover him in-depth are created by himself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eugenio Zuccarelli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 09:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eugenio Zuccarelli

Hello, Stanleycosgrovejr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eugenio Zuccarelli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eugenio Zuccarelli

Hello, Stanleycosgrovejr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eugenio Zuccarelli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]