User talk:Stangpa

Leave me a message for any quires. I'll try my best to answer the queries whenever I get time.

May 2021

Hello Stangpa. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Stangpa. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Stangpa|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 18:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GSS!

Thank you for asking this. Neither I have received any remuneration nor I expect so in the future. Whatever I do, I have been doing based on my interest. I have been spending hours on Wikipedia on daily basis÷, and I have more than 250 edits, all are constructive. No one has been paying me for these edits. I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, even before creating this account I have been contributing via IP addresses. I created this account to keep track of my contributions. If you have any evidence, please disclose it publicly, otherwise please don't tag me with WP:Paid just on your assumptions. Thank you. Stangpa (talk) 09:04, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As per off-wiki evidence, Mia Kang‎ hired a freelancer a few days back on Upwork to do exactly what you did so you want to make a comment on that? I can't post anything publicly because that will reveal your real-life identity so I will be sharing those details will the concerned team privately. GSS ^💬 09:15, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, you are just assuming that I must be that freelancer? Share publicly whatever you want to share, at least I would know if you have any evidence or just dissuade the editors? Stangpa (talk) 09:39, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have shared the evidence with a few admins and they will for sure get back to you. GSS ^💬 10:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the above, KizlarSoruyor has red flags for undisclosed paid editing. Therefore:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 12:48, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]