User talk:Stangoldsmith

Welcome

Hello, Stangoldsmith, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —User:ACupOfCoffee @ 19:13, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1001 nights

Hello, I did NOT delete any thing from the article I only added one photo from wiki media [1]. I appreciate your work and timeline because simply it is relible and not based on national pride. plz don't blame me chick the history then you will see the other user delete it (he/she summerized his deletion). BTW there was a war of edits on that article (and others)that's why I don't really trust every thing here because someone else will come and delete your work because of some reason !! thanks --Aziz1005 09:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dont worry.Plz don't give up editing . I got mad as well because of those users they are trying to hide some facts "for some reason" so plz keep editing then your work will stay .Salam--Aziz1005 18:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stan, I took a look at your edit, and the majority of it that wasn't timeline was speculative, and you did not source some of your changes properly. For problematic articles, it is best to discuss changes on the talk page before you make them. You've been here on WP for quite a while, so you should be aware of things like this. MSJapan 19:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with your assessment. Can you please provide solid evidence? stan goldsmith 22:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sinbad's name

Hello. I was looking through the ercent editors on the Sinbad pafge and found user Aziz, whicvh brought me to you. So you're doing PhD work on the 1001 Nights! In that case, can you have a look at the Sinbad article, and, most especially, do you have anything more recent than Richard Burton as an authority on the etymology of Sinbad's name? We have all sorts of offbeat theories being added, but need something definitive. PiCo 06:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of references to marijuana in popular music

An editor has nominated List of references to marijuana in popular music, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of references to marijuana in popular music and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discovery! citation

You had placed this paragraph on my user page (instead of my talk page), so hope you don't mind if I transfer it here:

Barte - re: discovery! - you wrote "Barger said that Aramco would never agree to the publication of Stegner's original draft" but it never says that in the article you listed, which is why I changed the text, do you have issue with it saying : "Barger said this manuscript is likely never to be published"? This is more in line with what he said in the article, he didn't say anything about Aramco not publishing this manuscript. stan goldsmith 01:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Washington Post story I cited reads as follows:

Barger replied in an e-mail that "the 1958 contract concerns a work entitled 'The Story of Aramco and Its Pioneers' " (the title of the original Stegner manuscript, now held at the University of Utah). "This manuscript was never published and never will be," he added.

Barger said yesterday that what he meant to imply was that Aramco would never agree to the publication of Stegner's original draft. He also said that Stegner was paid an additional sum for the Aramco World serialization, which the author had reviewed before publication.

So seems to me that my version is closer--in that he seems quite emphatic about the point. But I could be missing something. Barte 01:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discovery! talk thread--relocated

I've copied the thread over to the article talk section, together with a comment on your comment. Thanks! Barte (talk) 01:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Stangoldsmith! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 213 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Pinchers - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]