User talk:StanfordHistory08

I welcome all discussion regarding the wiki pillars and creating a community of neutral fact based articles.

That said, I tend to cut more than I add.

Venezuelanalysis.com

Venezuelanalysis.com is clearly a controversial article, so if you wish to remove large parts of it, please discuss on the talk page and seek a consensus first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't actually know how to talk.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:39, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Aaron Brenneman

Why did you put your comment in User talk:Aaron Brenneman in an old section? How do you expect him to find it? You should move it to the bottom of the page. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 22:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Venezuelanalysis.com. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. As I have told you before, if you wish to remove large parts of this article, please discuss it on the talk page first and get a consensus supporting you. What you are doing is considered edit warring and will get you blocked if you continue. Also please be aware that blogs are rarely acceptable as reliable source, and almost never when they are personal blogs. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:25, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gregory Wilpert

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rd232 ^talk 10:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bloqueos indefinidos y otros cuentos

Que conste StanfordHistory08 que comparto tu frustracion y arrechera con la manipulacion vulgar y burda de wikipedia por parte de editores que manipulan y le limpian la reputacion a los caudillos como Chavez. Somos varios que nos hemos dado cuenta y queremos formalizar una queja. Si quieres contactame por esta via o enviame un correo privado para ponernos en contacto.--Shandari (talk) 07:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Hello, I looked at your account and it's seems to be blocked. But anyways it seems The neutrality of that article is disputed. It may take some time to be resolved, it should get better sooner or later.

Webclient101 (talk) 01:47, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]