User talk:Stan cignature

June 2022

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Le Sserafim, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:41, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

omg im so sorry!!! ='( ill try finding a better source next time =) xoxo Stan cignature (talk) 10:00, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm Btspurplegalaxy. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, XG (group), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 22:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

so sorry!!! 💔 I'll find a better source next time :-) Stan cignature (talk) 15:47, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Dobler-Dahmer Theory (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Dobler-Dahmer Theory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stan cignature! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Dobler-Dahmer Theory

Hello, Stan cignature. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Dobler-Dahmer Theory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:19, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]