User talk:StanKent

Welcome

Hello, Hastrode, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 11:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

January 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Haley Strode, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 11:57, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! And Thank you for your response and concern on documenting proper sources, however there were no sources supporting the initial facts listed -- which I know to be incorrect, as I created the page. I was simply trying to set the facts straight as I know them. I appreciate your efforts in keeping this page clear of incorrect data! The version you have reverted it to, had been altered many, many, times by people with false information. I will alter it back to the correct information, citing as many sources as possible. I would appreciate if you would help in not changing my corrections. And protecting it from others! If you continue, to change it back to false information, also without sources, I'll have to delete the page. Thank you for your help! --SK 21:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Haley Strode, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 21:36, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can use google to find out her age, if you change the date, find a source that says so. Shellwood (talk) 21:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- - Please don't delete my responses, so as to undermine my presence in this discussion, (I inserted it back into the coversation above).

Google is informed by the age listed on Wikipedia unfortunately. There is no where else online that states her age, however, I can state that I know the year I changed it to, to be true, and again- I created this page. It has been changed so many times with misinformation and I'm dealing yet again, with your misinformation that is based on nothing but Google - which cannot and should not be listed as a proper source.

AGAIN: The incorrect age listed on Google, is based on the Wiki Page. I am trying to make sure the information provided here is correct. There is also no source that she went to high school at the school listed, which is why I removed it. That was another addition from a random user.

The major problem with your changes, is that you also have no sources. The very thing you're requesting, you cannot provide either. I understand that you believe your actions to be correct, but you are reverting the edits back to what people with no sources have changed it to. Please cease and desist. I created this page to provide proper information and have been battling people changing the page on a daily basis with no sources either --- where were you then? --SK 22:26, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

It dosent matter if you say its incorrect, you need source this BLP edits. Provide a source for your claim or stop. WP:TRUTH. Shellwood (talk) 22:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It also doesn't matter if YOU say the last version was incorrect - you would need a source as well and you don't have one --- Do you see the hypocrisy? If you continue to touch this page without sources, I'm reporting this. --SK 22:43, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Here YOU go [1], [2], [3]. Where can YOU find the date 1990? Shellwood (talk) 22:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Those sources are called PICKUPS in the entertainment industry. The information is picked up from googling celebrities. Not even remotely reliable - especially when the misinformation was picked up by Wikipedia! You just cited a website called celeb b-days.com....Don't you see? That date that your seeing everywhere stems from the very false facts you're perpetuating.

Please read below about how to use sources with integrity - Wiki Policy reads:

Notice about sources*

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Take extra care to use high-quality sources. Material about living persons should not be added when the only sourcing is tabloid journalism. See more information on sources.

Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, see this page.**

Since you are such a vigilante, and your sources aren't remotely sufficient, we should be able to agree to delete all statements that aren't properly sourced. Those that you listed are lower-quality than tabloids - if there is such a thing. Can we at least agree upon that and stop wasting the time? Though the damage has already been done elsewhere, we can at least do our best on this page with REAL sources. (e.g. interviews, there are many) --SK 23:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Dont quote wikipedia when you cant provide any sources for your claims. Where did you find your birthdate? Shellwood (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That’s just my point. You don’t have sources and therefore no leg to stand on. Not one real one. That’s why it’s important to point out your hypocrisy. You are using tabloids. TABLOIDS that got their info from unsourced Wikipedia info. I WILL always quote the policies of this platform, when you can’t seem to comprehend them.

Neither of us have any kind of source. That’s what I’m saying. So what makes your word better than mine? The unsourced information should be deleted.

If you dont have a source why do you change birthdate then? Your whole argumentation falls and nice work with the CSD tag. It will be rejected, thats not how wikipedia works. Shellwood (talk) 00:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is that the way to talk to someone you’ve never met? Gross. Whatever happened to decency and debate? Thank you for wasting our time today. Please don’t contact me again. ***—SK 00:09, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:HOLLYWOOD, CA - AUGUST 28, Actress Haley Strode arrives at premiere.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:HOLLYWOOD, CA - AUGUST 28, Actress Haley Strode arrives at premiere.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 21:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HOLLYWOOD, CA - AUGUST 28, Actress Haley Strode arrives at premiere.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HOLLYWOOD, CA - AUGUST 28, Actress Haley Strode arrives at premiere.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]