User talk:Stan9999

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Stan9999! I am Thparkth and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Thparkth (talk) 01:21, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

I nominated the University of Texas at Dallas for a peer review. Hopefully we will get some good constructive comments on our page. Here is the UTD peer review page. Keep up the good work. Gig em! ;-) Oldag07 (talk) 04:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looking forward to see the comments. Hook 'Em Horns!:) Stan9999 (talk) 16:25, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fellow Texas Tech editor Wordbuilder put up a short review. One really good, but highly sought after Aggie editor Karanacs told me she would take a crack at it sometime. Things seem to be going well. Oldag07 (talk) 04:45, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like we are making headway with the edit. Whoosh! :)Stan9999 (talk) 13:08, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Once goal we could shoot for is good article or even better featured article status. BTW, notice which universities are featured articles and which ones are'nt. Gig em! ;-)23:46, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Hmmmmm, I see Texas A&M and Texas Tech but no UT Austin, oh well....Hook 'em Horns!:)Stan9999 (talk) 01:25, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just created a test page for a notable people section for the UTD page in my sandbox. Like it? Dislike it? I hope to polish it enough to make it public in a few days. Oldag07 (talk) 15:28, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! Go for it.Stan9999 (talk) 22:29, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't feel comfortable posting it until after my finals. Wednesday for me. Oldag07 (talk) 04:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We had a late, last minute review. Wikipedia:Peer review/University of Texas at Dallas/archive1 He has some good stuff. Oldag07 (talk) 21:34, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really am going on my wikibreak until August 16th. Best of luck with everything. It has been fun working with you. Oldag07 (talk) 09:16, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have a nice break. I have enjoyed working with you also and all the good help. Take care...Stan9999 (talk) 13:07, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am still working on the University of Texas at Dallas article. If you ever drop in let me know what you think so far. .Thanks a bunch!Stan9999 (talk) 04:48, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will be glad to take another look, but it will take me a few days. Please note that you posted your comment on an archived talk page - in the future, please make sure to use current talk pages (I saw your post in my watchlist, but I might have missed it otherwise). Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 18:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Sorry about posting in the archive, I was looking for the last post on the subject and forgot to return to the current talk page.Stan9999 (talk) 19:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a big deal - I figured it was something like that. I caught it, but knew not everyone watches talk archives. Take care, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 19:38, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Got a new Wikipedia:Peer review/University of Texas at Dallas/archive2 so I will be working on those items for a bit. I will probably ask you to take another look in a month or so if you have time and don't mind.Stan9999 (talk) 03:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have read the first half of the article and can make some comments at the PR if you want. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 12:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great! I would really appreciate it. I can use the help to improve the article. Thanks Stan9999 (talk) 12:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The University of Texas at Dallas academic programs pagemove

It's done! Olaf Davis (talk) 21:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Stan9999 (talk) 22:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar of Diligence

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For showing fortitude, stick-to-itiveness, and an openness to learning what makes a good article, I hereby award you this Barnstar of Diligence for you work at University of Texas at Dallas.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:39, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!Stan9999 (talk) 15:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article nomination

I am going to nominate it. I gave it a through reading. Copyediting is not my strong suit. While the peer reviews that the page undergoes have been great, really, it isn't until a page is nominated as a featured article candidate that the real criticism comes. It probably needs more polish, but honestly, I have banged my head long enough on it. If it doesn't pass, we should get some good feedback, and we will know where to go from there. Here is a link to the nomination page.

Tips for going through these:

People personally involved with the page shouldn't vote, but we can address the concerns from the page with comments
Definitely place the nomination page on your watchlist
Do not WP:CANVAS for votes. Something I have been accused of doing in the past.
Don't take criticism personally.
It isn't the end of the world if it doesn't pass. At worst, we should get some great feedback. At best, our (well mostly your) efforts should be rewarded.

Oldag07 (talk) 22:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good.00:19, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

I just feel good that the page is looking better.Stan9999 (talk) 02:46, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They archived the nomination. It was a bit precocious to nominate it this time, but we got some good feedback. We do need a good copyedit. I guess I could do a more through job then what I did last time. I was surprised how many comments we got against the "The" part of "The University of Texas at Dallas". Oh well. Oldag07 (talk) 04:10, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Oldag07, It was very good as it really improved the article. I think the article looks much better now. I asked Wordbuilder if he might help but he has not responded so I don't think he wants to. Can you archive the talk page except for my last post about the photo?Stan9999 (talk) 04:20, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit request

Sorry I haven't had a chance to look at the University of Texas at Dallas article. I've just been busy. If you're still interested, I'll be glad to help. →Wordbuilder (talk) 23:51, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I would really appreciate any help you could provide to improve the article.Stan9999 (talk) 00:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wordbuilder, thanks for the help on the lead. Your good help is appreciated.Stan9999 (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind. .

I hope you don't mind. I added this template to the UTD page. [1] Oldag07 (talk) 17:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oldag07, that is a good addition.18:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:UT_Dallas_Love_Jack.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:UT_Dallas_Love_Jack.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 01:41, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added information.Stan9999 (talk) 02:52, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas Stan9999! Thanks for all of your hard work on the UTD page. Oldag07 (talk) 01:27, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oldag07, thanks and a Merry Christmas to you!Stan9999 (talk) 01:43, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Making Amends

I hope you don't think that I'm trying to bug you or anything, but parking really is an issue at UTD and while I read your son goes here, unless you do you really don't know how bad it gets, and I wasn't making an unreferenced rant. We're circling the lots and showing up late to class trying to find a spot and it's getting frustrating.

I've been going to UTD for 8years now and they haven't done much of anything to help the parking situation at UTD and semester by semester it's getting worse. Also, I wasn't just randomly making up a figure when I said the school spent $17000+ on those trees.

That being said, out of respect, I won't edit the page again.

Ironsheik84 (talk) 22:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC)ironshiek84[reply]

Hi Ironsheik84, Sorry, I shouldn't have used the word rant. You were making a valid, good faith edit to the article. Wikipedia requires the article be neutral, unbiased and citing a source for the information. Thanks for bring up the parking issue. I did expanded the wording.Stan9999 (talk) 03:14, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, and thanks for all the work you put into the page.

UT Dallas Seal

Hi Stan9999, my name is Czarina. I work for the Office of Communications at UT Dallas.

May I get your help in removing the University Seal from the UT Dallas wiki page? The trademarked seal is reserved for official University correspondence and diplomas only, as outlined here: www.utdallas.edu/brand/logos/seal.

Many thanks for your ongoing support for UT Dallas! Czarina727 (talk) 22:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Czarina, Please note the following articles concerning fair use for encyclopedic purposes. "Many images of logos are used on Wikipedia and long standing consensus is that it is acceptable for Wikipedia to use logos belonging to others for encyclopedic purposes." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Logos

"Use of the logo in the article complies with Wikipedia non-free content policy, logo guidelines, and fair use under United States copyright law . This is a logo of an organization, item, or event, and is protected by copyright. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, of logos for certain uses involving identification and critical commentary may qualify as fair use under United States copyright law." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:University_of_Texas_at_Dallas_Seal.svg

BTW, I would appreciate any and all help on the UTD article.Stan9999 (talk) 03:40, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stan,

You're quite right about Wikipedia's guidelines for fair use of logos. However, the University seal--not to be confused with or used in place of our logo--is restricted only to official documents; it is reserved for use by the Office of the President of the University. So we wouldn't want visitors to be confused about the page content's source.

We can use the official UT Dallas logo instead: www.utdallas.edu/brand/logos/utdallaslogo. It is the preferred visual representation of the University.

I'm happy to make the logo change on the wiki article. What I'm really asking is for your agreement not to cancel it and revert back to the University seal. Your understanding and cooperation would be much appreciated! Czarina727 (talk) 15:35, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Czarina,

In order to avoid any conflict I will change it to the logo. However, I note other schools in the UT System market the seal and it is not just restricted to official documents. Note: UT Austin http://www.universitycoop.com/ePOS/store=108&item_number=56702&form=shared3/gm/detail.html&design=108 Stan9999 (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Yard3.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yard3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 20:09, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updated the information.Stan9999 (talk) 02:49, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

EAR

Hello Stan9999. The article Richardson, Texas has been the subject of a discussion at EAR. Among the comments were suggestions that the contributors could consider discussing any issues on the article's talk page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Founders Building-1964.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Founders Building-1964.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added tag.Stan9999 (talk) 21:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Those are some really good pictures of UT Dallas, much appreciated! Karthik Parameswaran (talk) 15:55, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!Stan9999 (talk) 19:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for all your hard work on the UT Dallas page. Oldag07 (talk) 13:33, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!Stan9999 (talk) 14:24, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UTD Comets Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UTD Comets Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corky | Chat? 13:23, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Stan9999. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UT Dallas Love Jack.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UT Dallas Love Jack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:06, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Founders Building, University of Texas at Dallas (1964).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Founders Building, University of Texas at Dallas (1964).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Plaque on the Founders Building (University of Texas at Dallas).jpg

The file File:Plaque on the Founders Building (University of Texas at Dallas).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Jim-reilly.jpg

The file File:Jim-reilly.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:James Reilly.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]