User talk:Stagehand

Feel free to join the stagecraft project. KeepOnTruckin 23:16, 16 October 2006 (UTC) (a theater technician)[reply]

Martha Graham

Thanks for attributing the quote at Martha Graham, and welcome to Wikipedia. After re-reading the article, I made the small change of adding the title of the book that you sourced for the quote, inline and below the quote -- so that a reader can see the attribution as they read the article -- but I left the details for the footnote, as you had done. Yes, yours was quite an appropriate edit, and thank you for your diligence.

As for deleting our conversation here on your user page, that is up to you and there is some disagreement over which is appropriate: some users archive their talk pages when they get cluttered, and only retain current conversations, some delete everything on their talk pages as soon as they have read it, and some use techniques somewhere in between.

The choice of style is up to you, regardless of the well-settled custom that users don't own their user pages, you will certainly be a very active contributor and reader on your own user page, so it's certainly appropriate for you to make the majority of decisions about it.

Thanks for your thoughtful note, I believe the majority of users, and the best examples of good editors would appreciate such gestures, as well as the friendly and cooperative tone of the message.

I think you shall do just fine here, again, welcome! If I may be of any assistance to you feel free to ask any questions or for any sort of help you need, any time. User:Pedant 18:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reference

Actually, there wasn't any problem with your reference amd I didn't make any changes to it. The problem was with the "notes" section at the bottom of the article, which kept your reference from being properly formatted. That said, you should always add an "accessed (insert date here)" notation when you cite online references b/c online references often change. I've added this in. If you need any more help, just let me know. Best, --Alabamaboy 22:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Martha Graham

I removed Donald McKayle from the list. I hadn't realized that was a direct quote. I'm surprised there has been any controversy in any of this. Thanks. Andrew Parodi 06:03, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Stagehand. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]