User talk:Stagalj

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of Velebit.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit war on Ante Starčević, using multiple reverts without gaining consensus to do so.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

You appear to be a sockpuppet of long-banned Velebit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log · rfcu), as you are editing the same materials as he and his sockpuppets did, restored materials added to Talk:Neo-Nazism by a number of checkuser-IDed Velebit sockpuppets after another editor removed them, and are behaving in a similar abusive manner.

Based on this conclusion, I have imposed an indefinite block on this account as well. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 05:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stagalj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not see any evidence against me given here. The very sad thing is that this administrator abuses his admin rights blatantly. I undid some talk pages removal - due to apparent fact that user Rjecina removed far more than comments of the suspected puppet

Decline reason:

This account may very well be a sock puppet of a banned user, and even if that is untrue, there has been edit warring and disruptive editing sufficient to justify a block of several days or a week. I am not going to unblock at this time; however, I have asked a checkuser to review this situation[1] and may consider unblocking if additional information comes to light. — Jehochman ^Talk 14:39, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.