User talk:Stadiumhopper

Stadiumhopper, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Stadiumhopper!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sangamner Municipal Cricket Stadium

The article Sangamner Municipal Cricket Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable local stadium, unreferenced with no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Malkangiri Stadium

The article Malkangiri Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this venue exists. Not in reference given. Google search finds a pic but not much else - non notable or a hoax?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm Qed237. I noticed that you made a change to an article, New York City FC, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 21:07, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jiangnan University Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jiangnan University Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiangnan University Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eat me, I'm a red bean (take a huge bite) 03:46, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Major League Soccer

added links pointing to Chicago Fire and Orlando City

North American Soccer League

added a link pointing to New York Cosmos

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miami Vice FC

The article Miami Vice FC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not announced as the official name of the team

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Toronto FC, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. The figure you added was not official. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 02:06, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Philadelphia Union 2

The article Philadelphia Union 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Team name not announced yet

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sounder Bruce 22:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cincinnati FC

The article Cincinnati FC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Team name not announced yet

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sounder Bruce 22:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Orlando City 2

The article Orlando City 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Team name has not been announced and is "likely not be called Orlando City II", according to the Orlando Sentinel.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sounder Bruce 22:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of professional sports leagues by revenue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NASL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of association football clubs by revenue

The article List of association football clubs by revenue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article simply mirrors an external, unreliably-sourced listing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnInDC (talk) 01:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of association football clubs by revenue for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of association football clubs by revenue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of association football clubs by revenue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnInDC (talk) 10:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you regard the article as a work in progress and are intending to add further sources to it, but your main one - that Google document - appears to be wholly unreliable, and the others (as best I was able to reach them) appear to be general discussions of the topic and do not provide the level of detail necessary to support the article. Also there's no indication that the information you're combining from these different sources reflects the same kind of measurement, or even the same time frame. I don't think you can do what you are trying to here within Wikipedia policies, at least not in this way. Perhaps the solution in the meantime would be for you to move the article to your sandbox and work on it there until you've figured how to sort out these issues. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 11:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. Again I appreciate that you're working on the article but in the meantime you cannot remove the "Articles for deletion" template message at the top. If you have comments on why the article shouldn't be deleted, you should state them there and let the process run itself out. Also - the article you linked to - sports leagues with revenues over 50MM euros - may or may not provide support for an article that goes down as far as 5MM euros, per team. I really think you should work on the article outside of live article space until it is in a condition to be published. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 11:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also - please stop adding that Google document as a source for your edits. It looks like just a list compiled by some guy with no apparent credentials, and as such it is not a "reliable source" for Wikipedia purposes. I have removed it in the couple of places I've found it. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 11:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of tips

Hey, Stadiumhopper - I've looked over a few of your edits and thought I'd offer a couple of suggestions for ways to ensure good editing of the encyclopedia. The first is, use the Preview button! Two or three of the links you added to List of association football clubs by revenue lead to dead-ends; and, while I was able to Google them and find generally what you might have intended to link to, I couldn't find the specific document. Using the Preview button to make sure your links work is helpful! (Also - can you go back and fix them? Thanks.) Next, pay attention to context. You added both the Big 10 and Southeastern Conference to the article, List of professional sports leagues by revenue, but neither of those is a professional sports league. Likewise when you changed Usain Bolt's sport from "track and field" to "athletics" here, it created a category that didn't match any other on the list, wasn't really correct, and linked not to a sport but to a disambiguation page. As you go forward, think about each edit, and double-check it before you make it. This is live material, and when you make a mistake the encyclopedia is wrong until someone comes around to fix it! Thanks - JohnInDC (talk) 12:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stadiumhopper, please pay attention to what you are doing. Again please use the Preview button. Your edit here broke some internal citation links and they have to be fixed. And again, please pay attention to context and the substance of your edits. [Here you changed the name of the football team from the correct name to a misspelled one. You need to be more careful - these edits are verging on disruptive now. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 13:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also please read WP:reliable to gain an understanding of what is, and what isn't, a reliable source. Self-published content, blogs, and the like are generally not deemed reliable and can't serve as sources. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 14:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Stadiumhopper - when you make changes, you should supply a source for your edits; and also be sure that the change you make are consistent with the sources. For example, at Sporting Kansas City you changed the team's stadium capacity to 21,000 when the stadium's own website confirms that the figure is 18,467 for soccer - see here. This is important; when you make changes based on your own knowledge or supposition, other editors can't tell whether you've done the correct thing or not. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 13:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Most valuable sports clubs

The article Most valuable sports clubs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article simply mirrors a portion of a list prepared, as of a particular date, by a staff blogger at Forbes, and as such is unsuitable for a standalone article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnInDC (talk) 15:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Soccer stadiums

Hello. Please use the | soccerstadium = field in the college athletics infobox when adding soccer stadiums to infoboxes. Also, please do not remove a field as you did in this edit. Ahern Fieldhouse deserves to be there, too. Thanks. Corkythehornetfan 22:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of US soccer clubs listed by stadium capacity

The article US soccer clubs listed by stadium capacity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Questionable and incomplete sourcing, substantially OR, with no indication of what criteria determine whether a team is or is not to be included on this self-described "partial" list of teams and their stadiums

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnInDC (talk) 03:11, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Average attendances of sports clubs

What is this article supposed to be about? It doesn't say which sports these teams play. Deb (talk) 16:08, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Average attendances of sports clubs

The article Average attendances of sports clubs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unexplained collection of attendance figures from a variety of sports, with no clear connection to the sources; OR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnInDC (talk) 17:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Average attendances of sports clubs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Average attendances of sports clubs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Average attendances of sports clubs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 20:34, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The 100 professional sports teams having the most fans on the social networks

The article The 100 professional sports teams having the most fans on the social networks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Indiscriminate (and expressly incomplete) list of questionably sourced information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnInDC (talk) 02:14, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated creation of dubious "list of" articles

Stadiumhopper -

You have surely noticed that the "list" articles you are creating are being proposed or nominated for deletion almost as soon as they are created (and not just by me). It's hard to summarize the essential, and generally unfixable problems with each of these articles, but the gist is that, just because you can make a list of something, doesn't mean it has a place here. See, for example, WP:NOTSTATS. I suggest you read the deletion discussions (one complete, one ongoing) to help you understand what the problems are - they can be found at WP:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_association_football_clubs_by_revenue and WP:Articles_for_deletion/Average_attendances_of_sports_clubs. Wikipedia:Stand-alone_lists#Style also has useful information about what kinds of things are appropriately included in stand-alone lists, and WP:OR and WP:Synthesis will give you some help in understanding how far Wikipedia editors can go (not far) in creating new articles by combining information from a variety of different, unrelated sources. I urge you to look at all of these. I am sure that it's no fun for you to spend time creating a list article, only to see it deleted; and it's no fun for other editors either to seek their deletion. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This link may summarize it better than any of the foregoing: Wikipedia:Listcruft. JohnInDC (talk) 11:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The 100 professional sports teams having the most fans on the social networks

added links pointing to Chelsea, Cruzeiro, Everton, Texas Rangers, River Plate and Santos

Average attendances of sports clubs

added a link pointing to Texas Rangers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! JohnInDC (talk) 01:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of US soccer clubs listed by stadium capacity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article US soccer clubs listed by stadium capacity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US soccer clubs listed by stadium capacity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnInDC (talk) 12:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Average attendances of non-football clubs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Average attendances of non-football clubs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Average attendances of non-football clubs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 12:07, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Staafros1, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. JohnInDC (talk) 15:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]