User talk:St Judas the Lazarene

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, St Judas the Lazarene. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Thegreatluigi (talk) 16:06, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! St Judas the Lazarene (talk) 06:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grey Wolves

Hi there, I would like to thank you for your edits at the Grey Wolves article. But maybe there is some misunderstanding. If you read the article's lead, you can see that the Grey Wolves are already described as a terrorist organization. And it is sourced. The Grey Wolves is not declared a terrorist organization all over the world, or by the UN, therefore we can not include the sentence "it is a terrorist organization" but we can include it is a organization designated or classified as a terrorist organization. I hope this is of help, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:57, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, about your recent edit in the Grey Wolves article: 4 of the 5 sources you provided don't include the Grey wolves and the 5th is from an outlet I have never read of, and I can't accede it. If you want to improve the article about the Grey Wolves, in order to make your contributions solid, you should use citations that include the Grey Wolves. Anyway, I really appreciate your collaboration, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to fight with you sorry if it came off like that.

I put back what was used on the main page for Neo-fascism. I don't want to fight with you I just think we should not remove links if they are used on the main page.ShawnNora (talk) 16:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All right, but just because a template is on a page it doesn't mean that it belongs there. That would be circular logic. Some editor put that template there, and someone else can remove it, if there's good reason. Anyway, no hard feelings :) --St Judas the Lazarene (talk) 08:18, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions for American politics and gender issues

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

}

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason why you felt the need to issue this "standard" message to me in particular? Especially as I have not, to my knowledge, shown much of an interest in either American politics or GamerGate, or "gender" controversies? St Judas the Lazarene (talk) 13:59, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As it says, it's a standard message and you have edited in those areas - in fact in the last week. Ignore the "gamergate" bit, that's there because that's the case that resulted in these sanctions. Doug Weller talk 16:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notification

Hi, I've started a report that concerns you. The thread is: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:St Judas the Lazarene: slavery / Nazi Germany / far-right topics. --K.e.coffman (talk) 18:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 17:41, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]