User talk:Ssummers2015/sandbox

Article Evaluation

Below, I will Be evaluating the Wikipedian article "Hubbs beaked whale"

The first introduction paragraph of this article does is worded poorly, and includes no citations. The taxonomy section reads well and is cited. The physical description paragraph is written with a lot of jargon and is not cited but the information is concise and relevant. The population and distribution section is again not cited. This section states ideas then then points out they are not facts. Since items stated here are not facts, they should be removed from the page. Finally the conservation section does have a citation but provides little information. Both sources used did seem credited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssummers2015 (talk • contribs) 20:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)