User talk:Sschieren/sandbox

Hi Sschieren: The draft you completed in your sandbox looks good. The only thing that is missing are the citations in a references list at the bottom of the article. Please see the "Citing_your_sources" document posted in Canvas for how to cite your sources in the text and put them in a references list. Otherwise, excellent job so far! Prof.bgreg (talk) 20:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Barakakos- Reply to article

The sources were very well listed and there were a lot of statistics included in your response which helps it seem very reliable and credible. The response gave a good general idea of how islamophobia is portrayed in the media. Its also good that you spoke about the effects of what people think when islamophobia is presented in the media. it also fits in very well with the other content existing in the article which is a good way to give a better idea about the topic. It is also a good intro to article because it gives a general idea while the rest of the article is more specific to different ideas.

Peer Review Response

Thank you for your feedback on my draft for the Islamophobia in the Media article. If there are any other suggestions that you can think of so that I can improve it, please let me know. Sschieren (talk) 07:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

draft feedback

@Sschieren: Hi! It looks like you've found a few nice sources for improving the article. Before it's ready for moving into Wikipedia, you should add inline citations and clearly indicate in the text which conclusions and findings have been published by whom. Avoid unattributed states, like "It has been found...". See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Unsupported_attributions for more on the expectations of Wikipedia's writing style.--Sage (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]