User talk:Ss59861

hey Rajput brother, just so u know, Parashurama did not kill all Khsatriyas 21 times or anything, He destroyed the Haihaya warriors 21 times (yet they still exist today) - Goldenhawk hey brother,,i am not making up facts..I am presenting you the truths,why are you constantly deleting my information.all other castes are giving their famous peopkle names,,why are you deleting,i swear,i am presenting the truths to best of my knowledge.

Hey u crowbeat ... Kshatriyas rule the world..not the fat brahmins... Even parshurama had to concede defeat to Lord Ram who was Kshatriya..

U asshole u dickhead..getthe staright..whatever comments i add are authentic.. Ms dhoni is rajput..but u keep on deleting that, whereas on sehwag page u allow to be written that he is jat... badgujjars are rajputs..not one u ask will tell they are gujjars.. u are trying to remove rajput glorius history..i will not tolerate..u mongrose..

Rajputs were the rulers of india and gujjars and jats are farmers and cattle herders... u urself are giving wrong information to the wrol.d

wat sort of wikipedia is that.. u must have taken some bribe..u sukker head....

Shilp Guru Shri Kripal Singh Shekhawat

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shilp Guru Shri Kripal Singh Shekhawat, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://rajputindia.com/resources/DownloadWord.asp?JournalID=617&sTitle=Shilp+Guru+Shri+Kripal+Singh+Shekhawat. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lt Commander Rashmi Singh

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lt Commander Rashmi Singh, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.rajputindia.com/resources/DownloadWord.asp?JournalID=601. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ashok Kumar Singh, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sportal.nic.in/legenddetails.asp?sno=701&moduleid=&maincatid=41&subid=0&comid=55. As a copyright violation, Ashok Kumar Singh appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ashok Kumar Singh has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ashok Kumar Singh and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ashok Kumar Singh with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ashok Kumar Singh.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. WWGB 10:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Pankaj Singh

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Pankaj Singh, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Pankaj Singh seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Pankaj Singh, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot 18:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Mahendra Singh Dhoni has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Enigma ^msg! 05:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mahendra Singh Dhoni. Enigma ^msg! 05:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kubigula (talk) 05:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I give u proof that dhoni is a rajput chk it http://my.opera.com/AaryanRajput/blog/.

October 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Mahendra Singh Dhoni, you will be blocked from editing. You have already been blocked for adding the same content. If you continue to do so you will be permanently blocked from editing Wikipedia. -SpacemanSpiff 05:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Your addition to Tomar Rajputs has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 14:43, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ss59861! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 71 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Lokendra Singh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Gujar. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sikh-History 07:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bargujar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Chhora (talk) 14:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that Wikipedia administrators can block editors who engage in vandalism and other disruptive behavior. Thank you. thanks Chhora (talk) 12:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Bargujar, you will be blocked from editing. Stop removing sourced content and adding your point of view to articles. —SpacemanSpiff 09:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Mahendra Singh Dhoni. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 09:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I give u proof that dhoni is a rajput chk it http://my.opera.com/AaryanRajput/blog/. You mother fucker you bastard u biased ronchos...the bastard gujjar suppporter.. I am a badgujjar and i am a rajput..why are u vandalising our histroy by removing my content..u suckdickeer.. Y u add contents about other castes.. Badgujjars are raghav and are rajputs... u bastard.,..

Proof taht badgujjars are rajputs.. chk.. http://ebadgujar.com/history.html

Blocked

this and the message above are not fun. Thus.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey u crowbeat ... Kshatriyas rule the world..not the fat brahmins... Even parshurama had to concede defeat to Lord Ram who was Kshatriya..

U asshole u dickhead..getthe staright..whatever comments i add are authentic.. Ms dhoni is rajput..but u keep on deleting that, whereas on sehwag page u allow to be written that he is jat... badgujjars are rajputs..not one u ask will tell they are gujjars.. u are trying to remove rajput glorius history..i will not tolerate..u mongrose..

Rajputs were the rulers of india and gujjars and jats are farmers and cattle herders... u urself are giving wrong information to the wrol.d Rajputs are the rulers u bastard u mongrose..u dikkhead....u champelin poison envy drinking garbage slutter..

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ss59861 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

http://ebadgujar.com/history.html

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Taelus (talk) 10:42, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ss59861 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

http://my.opera.com/AaryanRajput/blog

Decline reason:

Does not address the issues (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have revoked your talk page access due to your continued personal attacks on this very talk page. --Taelus (talk) 10:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]