User talk:Srobodao84

This is Srobodao84's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Body image disturbance has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Body image disturbance. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Body image disturbance has been accepted

Body image disturbance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 23:21, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Body dissatisfaction moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Body dissatisfaction, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, medical, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kleuske (talk) 15:40, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thank you@Kleuske Srobodao84 (talk) 15:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to [[:Body dissatisfaction]], without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some [[Wikipedia:Article titles|guidelines]] in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the [[:testwiki:|test]] Wikipedia. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcome|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [[User:Riteboke|Riteboke]] ([[User talk:Riteboke|talk]]) 15:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

i didnt move the page @Riteboke Srobodao84 (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did. Kleuske (talk) 15:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

w.r.t. The Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism

User:Srobodao84 Where I live in Sydney, Australia is currently under a full Covid-lockdown. This at-home isolation is producing a range of difficulties in a quite number of dimensions. Please can you allow me another 3 days (i.e., until Sunday, noon, Sydney time) before making your decision on "Good Article" rating. I should have been able to finish all of the work with adjustments, additions, and amendments that need to be done by then. Thanks, in anticipation, Lindsay658 (talk) 22:50, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Srobodao84 Although it's taken a little longer than expected, I have completed my work. Thanks for your generous consideration.Lindsay658 (talk) 08:44, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Srobodao84 Having never been involved with a "Good Page" review before, I am unsure about whether I need to do anything in relation to the Talk:The Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism/GA1 page, or whether I just leave everything up to others at this stage. Lindsay658 (talk) 11:40, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lindsay658 let me look at your changes and I'll update you Srobodao84 (talk) 21:15, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Srobodao84 Thanks for all the work. Lindsay658 (talk) 01:01, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lindsay658 If you have some time, can you read Body image disturbance and give me some language advice? I'm not a native English speaker, and I don't know if the article sounds good. Srobodao84 (talk) 13:47, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Srobodao84 Unfortunately, at the moment and over the next month or so I am very busy. However, from a brief glance, it immediately seems that -- quite apart from any issues of "language" -- there are a number of rather simple (but time-consuming for you) steps that you can take to very significantly improve both the transfer of information to your readers and the overall attractiveness and readability of the article:

(1) The section that you currently have as "References" is extremely confusing. The conflated complex of material that you have included needs to be completely reworked and, for clarity-to-your-readers, completely split into two separate and independent sections:

(a) that of "Notes" – quite different from what you have currently written -- which simply identify the author, date of the item cited, and (where relevant), the page number of the section of that item that you are directly citing -- and, of course, any other parenthetical comments, embellishments, explanations you may choose to relegate to these footnotes;

(b) that of a list of "References" -- in the alphabetical order of the authors’names -- which contains all of the details you have already written in what you have designated "References".

(2) You need to include a "See also" section.
(3) In many locations, you need to break your large lumps of text into smaller lumps, by introducing sub-sections (using four ====). For example, at Body_image_disturbance#Treatments_focused_on_perceptive_component, after the introductory sentence, "New treatments for body image disturbance have recently been developed, focusing on the disorder's perceptual component", the remaining five lumps of text make distinct sub-sections, which could be labelled something like: "Mirror Exposure", "VR-Body Swapping", "Hoop Training", "Body Perception Treatment", "Efficacy".
(4) make sure that you explain each of your abbreviations – for example the mystery of the puzzling encounter with the term "ED" in the leading section would be immediately removed if you were to have "Body image disturbance (BID) is a frequent symptom in patients with eating disorders (ED)".

Hope that helps, Lindsay658 (talk) 21:13, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Body image disturbance

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Body image disturbance you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Psiĥedelisto -- Psiĥedelisto (talk) 16:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Psiĥedelisto thank you very much for your time and your passion. The article needs improvements...i know...but your time is a great gift for the community Srobodao84 (talk) 17:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I left some beginning comments at Talk:Body image disturbance/GA1. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 17:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Body image disturbance

The article Body image disturbance you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Body image disturbance for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Psiĥedelisto -- Psiĥedelisto (talk) 06:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Body image disturbance

The article Body image disturbance you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Body image disturbance for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Psi?edelisto -- Psi?edelisto (talk) 00:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Psi?edelisto thanks a lot dude. Thank's for your job! Srobodao84 (talk) 07:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Body image disturbance

On 5 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Body image disturbance, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that body image disturbance is a common symptom in patients with eating disorders? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Body image disturbance. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Body image disturbance), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Body dissatisfaction

Hello, Srobodao84. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Body dissatisfaction, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Body-dissatisfaction

Hello, Srobodao84. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Body-dissatisfaction, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Body dissatisfaction

Hello, Srobodao84. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Body dissatisfaction".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Body-dissatisfaction

Hello, Srobodao84. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Body-dissatisfaction".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Body image disturbance

Hello Srobodao84, So sorry I missed your submission of Body image disturbance at WP:JAN. If you're still interested let me know and I'll process it now! Apologies again that it slipped through my notifications. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 05:30, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Evolution and evolvability yes ... it would be nice if you processed it ... I would appreciate it very much Srobodao84 (talk) 11:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your JA nomination of Body image disturbance

The Body image disturbance article has been imported to v:WikiJournal Preprints/Body image disturbance (per WP:JAN). Whenever you're ready to proceed:

Fill in the 'article info' template at the top (often easiest in VisualEditor)
Fill in the authorship declaration form to submit as ready for external peer review to be organised.

Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 22:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Evolution and evolvability i think i've done...i filled the article info anche submitted the form. Where can I check if I have completed the procedure correctly? Srobodao84 (talk) 16:07, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It should now appear on this list: v:WikiJournal_User_Group/Potential_upcoming_articles. Once a peer review coordinator has been assigned, they should contact you to let you know that they're contacting potential reviewers. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 04:15, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]