User talk:Srinivasrao1980
I'm talking on behalf of
 | CheckUser evidence confirms that the owner of this account has abusively used multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets) |  |
.
@Bishonen: blocked me without any reason and I don't know he having own common sense or not?? Bishonen blocked me on the suggestion of @Sintush:.
If you unblock me or not it's doesn't matter for me but I have some questions as below
- I had edited Yadav article and added chaudhary Brahm Prakash Yadav photo but Sintush told me single people can't represents the whole community and he removed this image then I asked him how Chaudhary Charan Singh represented the Jat People , after that he removed the image from Jat People of Chaudhary charan Singh image.
- Again I have removed the existing image from Yadav article and added the recent image of National executive meeting at Bangalore at 10th November 2019 with reliable sources but he removed.
- Bishonen can you told me or ask to Sintush , who have given right to him to abusive the whole community and ""Bihar Government""
- I have more than 10 example of this type of nonsense doing with me by Sintush.If I added any article with reference then Sintush will simply removed , I don't know why he doing like this ??
- In All india Yadav Mahasabha article I have added from 1924 to 2020 National president list and state wise President list he also removed without any valid reason ??
- In Chaudhary Brahm Prakash Yadav article I added date of birth with reliable sources (Dainik jagran newspaper) then Sintush removed simply without any reason ??
Like this I have so many example but Bishonen don't asked me or he don't know anything and he simply blocked me on the suggestion of Sintush.
For more information everyone can see either on given example or
| CheckUser evidence confirms that the owner of this account has abusively used multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets) | |
talk page in ""Please be aware "" section.
Bishonen don't blocked any user without anything known ,you have also own mind I think.
Lastly I told to everyone if block me or unblock me it's doesn't matter for me specially informed to Bishonen, if I was wrong then no issue u can blocked but why you can blocked me on the suggestion of Sintush hence Sintush was wrong.
( User Vipinahir )
[edit]@Bishonen: l have given some questions and need valid answer from you as well as @Sitush: because you blocked me on the suggestion of Sintush , you doesn't used own common sense or mind before blocking me ?? Srinivasrao1980 (talk) 20:31, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, Vipinahir/Srinivasrao1980. When you're blocked, you're not allowed to simply create a new account. That is known as sockpuppetry and is strictly forbidden. You, the person, are blocked, not merely your account. And yes, I did use my own common sense before blocking you. It wasn't hard: you're obviously only here for caste glorification, which is not allowed. If you wish to edit Wikipedia, what you can do is log in to your Vipinahir account and appeal (again, since it looks like you have done it once) at the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please try to write a better appeal this time. I suggest you read the Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks before you try. I have blocked this new account. Socks are always blocked. Bishonen | tålk 20:54, 20 June 2020 (UTC).
Bishonen how can you simply say about me I'm doing caste glorification ??
I explained all the point here as well as you can see Vipinahir talk page on please be aware section ??
Can you tell me any point regarding caste glorification ?? Srinivasrao1980 (talk) 09:20, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
@Bishonen: Atleast tell me any one point regarding caste glorification then I'll know ?? When I did caste glorification and where ?? Srinivasrao1980 (talk) 09:27, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear @Arbitration Committee and Arbitration Committee: Team, Bishonen simple blocked me on the suggestion of Sintush , I'm asking one reason for blocked by administrator but he is unable to give me valid reason/answer. Srinivasrao1980 (talk) 09:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
@Bishonen: I need perfect answer from you why you simply blocked me without using your own common sense, simply suggestions of Sintush.
If you revoke this id talk page then I'll create multiple account by cyber café don't worries. I need valid reason/answer why you blocked me (Vipinahir) I'd.
Srinivasrao1980 (talk) 09:49, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
@Bishonen: blocked me without any reason and I don't know he having own common sense or not?? Bishonen blocked me on the suggestion of @Sitush:
If you unblock me or not it's doesn't matter for me but I have some questions as below
- I had edited Yadav article and added chaudhary Brahm Prakash Yadav photo but Sintush told me single people can't represents the whole community and he removed this image then I asked him how Chaudhary Charan Singh represented the Jat People , after that he removed the image from Jat People of Chaudhary charan Singh image.
Again I have removed the existing image from Yadav article and added the recent image of National executive meeting at Bangalore at 10th November 2019 with reliable sources but he removed. Bishonen can you told me or ask to Sintush , who have given right to him to abusive the whole community and ""Bihar Government"" I have more than 10 example of this type of nonsense doing with me by Sintush.If I added any article with reference then Sintush will simply removed , I don't know why he doing like this ?? In All india Yadav Mahasabha article I have added from 1924 to 2020 National president list and state wise President list he also removed without any valid reason ?? In Chaudhary Brahm Prakash Yadav article I added date of birth with reliable sources (Dainik jagran newspaper) then Sintush removed simply without any reason ?? Like this I have so many example but Bishonen don't asked me or he don't know anything and he simply blocked me on the suggestion of Sintush.
For more information everyone can see either on given example or Vipinahir talk page. Srinivasrao1980 (talk) 10:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
@Bishonen: for your information kindly go to Vipinahir talk page in Please be aware section and see the all discussion with me and Sitush.
@Sitush: come and give the answer or help to Bishonen , I know you don't have courage to give the valid reason in front to all ?? If you have come and give ?? Srinivasrao1980 (talk) 10:13, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
June 2020
[edit] | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bishonen | tålk 20:55, 20 June 2020 (UTC) |
@Bishonen: see all the explanation here. Srinivasrao1980 (talk) 09:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.