User talk:Srhzaidi

October 2012

Hello, I'm AutomaticStrikeout. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Abraham because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. AutomaticStrikeout 02:26, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abraham. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Abraham was changed by Srhzaidi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.933815 on 2012-10-18T03:14:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:14, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bahá'í Faith with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. gwickwire | Leave a message 03:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bahá'í Faith. gwickwire | Leave a message 03:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Well, the basic three (happy/confused/sad) helps with responding to feedback and to get a general sense of how editors are feeling about their editing experience. Many new editors who are sad are usually frustrated too. Did you feel at all frustrated with editing recently?

I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 08:48, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

I am here in response to a report on you at Administrator intervention against vandalism. The only reason I am not blocking you immediately is that I do not think the messages above have made clear enough what the problems with your editing are. A few edits, such as this one, can reasonably be characterized as vandalism, but the main problem seems to be that Wikipedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view. It is unacceptable to try to impose your own opinions on an article, whether religious opinions or anything else. It is also completely unacceptable to try to suppress record of views you disagree with, by removing them from articles. If you continue in the same way, you will be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:20, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:28, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message on my talk page. I have replied there. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:39, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Srhzaidi, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 03:44, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]