User talk:Sreiffmarganiec

April 2008

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 08:33, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Stephan Reiff-Marganiec

A tag has been placed on Stephan Reiff-Marganiec requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Toddst1 (talk) 08:35, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As the reviewing administrator, I did not delete the article, though it needs more information to show your accomplishments, including major publication -- with times cited. See WP:PROF. It will almost certainly be nominated for deletion very quickly, and may not stand. I do not think the Treasurer position will be held sufficiently significant. Any prizes or editorships? DGG (talk) 15:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you will find some additional discussion at the bottom of my user page. DGG (talk) 19:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Stephan Reiff-Marganiec

Hello, Sreiffmarganiec, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephan Reiff-Marganiec whether the article Stephan Reiff-Marganiec should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Stephan Reiff-Marganiec, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! - Jarry1250 ^{[Weasel? Discuss.]} 14:36, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]