User talk:Sreenu S

Welcome!

Hi Sreenu S! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jacona (talk) 15:52, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jacona for your good courage Sreenu S (talk) 15:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jishnu Raghavan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jishnu Raghavan. Thanks! Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 15:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yah just now I saw the notification Sreenu S (talk) 15:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I'm not a Sockpuppet I'm created this article randomly. Sreenu S (talk) 15:15, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not a sock, how were you able to recreate a draft for Jishnu Raghavan which is exactly similar to the previous versions created by the blocked accounts. I'm an active content creator and intended to write the article myself after sometime. But this is quite embarrassing and irritating. Your consistent socking is simply decreasing the likelihood of a significant person's article being in Wikipedia's mainspace again. Stop socking again and request for an unblock from your original account. Thilsebatti (talk) 17:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See here, believing me or not is your wish yah. But I'm not a SOCK. Why you all are suspectin me like this Sreenu S (talk) 00:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jishnu Raghavan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jishnu Raghavan. Thanks! Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 15:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Sock, I'm not a Sock please don't suspect me I had just created this article in a good faith. It's true that I'm not a SOCK. In this wikipedia platform I'm to edit and create new article in my future. Now currently, I have 2 draft aricles. Sreenu S (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rah e Junoon (TV series) (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rah e Junoon (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sreenu S! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rah e Junoon (TV series) (December 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

CNMall41 (talk) 23:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. UtherSRG (talk) 11:51, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]