User talk:SrCerberus

March 2021

Hello, I'm Femkemilene. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. FemkeMilene (talk) 19:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fidesz

Before making such reverts, it is recommended to look at what's going on with the page. In this case, it's a sockpuppet vio reinstating information without previous consensus. --Vacant0 (talk) 13:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

No idea what your definition of vandalism is, but apart from the above section, you are also reverting someone's edits to their own user talk page thrice[1], and this doesn't seem to be a mistake either[2]. This wasn't vandalism either, and this, while not formatted correctly or sourced, wasn't vandalism either but a correct edit. All these are from your latest short group of edits, so your error rate is way too high. Fram (talk) 13:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram. And how do you think I can tell if I'm wrong? Its so difficult, I only want to revert the vandalism. (っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ 𝔹𝕪ℂ𝕖𝕣𝕓𝕖𝕣𝕦𝕤 ♥ Talk to me! 13:33, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to familiarize yourself a lot more with our policies, or restrict yourself to very clear cases of vandalism only for now. This is clear vandalism, so feel free to continue with such stuff. But if you don't even know that people are allowed to remove threads from their own talk page however they see fit, then you are not ready for more widespread or delicate vandalism patrolling. You only made just above 100 edits, most of them in the last two days. There is no rush, start gently, with either the very obvious stuff, or by actually editing articles yourself. Fram (talk) 13:43, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram. I understand, thanks. (っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ 𝔹𝕪ℂ𝕖𝕣𝕓𝕖𝕣𝕦𝕤 ♥ Talk to me! 13:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Fram, you should first look at what's going on with the page before reverting someone else's edits. If you can, please perform a self-revert on Fidesz since you just reinstated information that was added by a sockpuppet, the added information wasn't even discussed. --Vacant0 (talk) 13:54, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SrCerberus, you may find this essay helpful as it contains examples and you might want to check out WP:CVUA. In addition, I found enabling the Navigation Popups gadget helpful as it provides information about editors, such as how old their account is, their edit count, user rights, etc., by hovering over their name. For example, when I hover over Fram, I see they have been here since 2005, have several user rights and over 200k edits so is certainly an experienced editor, thus chances are extremely slim they are committing vandalism. S0091 (talk) 18:18, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks @S0091 for that essay, i will read it entirely. (っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ 𝔹𝕪ℂ𝕖𝕣𝕓𝕖𝕣𝕦𝕤 ♥ Talk to me! 09:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

.l.

cerote flanders Atlacatl Cortés (talk) 21:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlacatl Cortés. What do you mean by that? Me lo puedes decir en español si quieres, pero en eswiki. 🫡 𝘇𝘂 𝗜𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝗗𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻 Talk to me! 21:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

178.19.145.14

Why the hell did you revert my edit in Hirameki? Could you not read my edit note? I removed info that were wrong and lacking sources. Judging by the comments made by others on this page you're not new to consider vandalism what isn't. 178.19.145.14 (talk) 21:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sig broken?

Hey! Is your signature broken? Because for me it's just a bunch of blank squares and then "Talk to me!" ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf. Hi. I have checked it and I think it's ok. 🫡 𝘇𝘂 𝗜𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝗗𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻 Talk to me! 16:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SrCerberus, it is still not correct. Please take a look at WP:CUSTOMSIG to see how to correctly customize your signature. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I ran it through a Unicode detector and while it's probably not perfect, here's what it says it's supposed to display: 🫡 zu Ihren Diensten. I dunno if that's correct or if that's complete gibberish ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The actual characters are "MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF BOLD CAPITAL/SMALL letter" with "letter" being the corresponding letter. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize @Blaze Wolf and @LuK3. I have already reset the signature, sorry for causing so much inconvenience. Is now correct? 🫡 zu Ihren Diensten Talk to me! 18:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The first character is still blank. Dunno if that's intentional or not. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I switched from my laptop to a PC and your previous signature is displaying semi-correctly now. First character is still blank but it is looking right. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf Done. Can you confirm that there are no more errors? I apologize for wasting your time... (-_-) zu Ihren Diensten Talk to me! 18:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright! You didn't waste my time at all. It looks correct now. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf. Finally, thank you for your help. (-_-) zu Ihren Diensten Talk to me! 18:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Thank you for making a report about 192.0.2.16 (talk · contribs · block log) at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Summoners War Sky Arena

Why on earth are you reverting my undoings on the Summoners War: Sky Arena page and calling them vandalism when they clearly are inaccurate info? Did you not read the edit note? --24.44.76.188 (talk) 17:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning for making bad reverts using automated tools

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Per this restoration. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie. I'm not using automated tools. It's semi-automatic tool, I will stop using the tools anyway. (-_-) zu Ihren Diensten Talk to me! 18:05, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]