User talk:Squigle ducky

Squigle ducky, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Squigle ducky! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at User_talk:JBW.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the block on your account, as it seems to have been made in error. JBW (talk) 15:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I was trying to fix the vandalism but messed it up by mistake.

November 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pinocchio (1940 film) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pinocchio (1940 film) was changed by Squigle ducky (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.932596 on 2021-11-19T20:28:24+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:28, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jimi Hendrix. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:26, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know why I was blocked, i just made a simple mistake and fixed it right away.

I dont know why I was blocked, i just made a simple mistake and fixed it right away.@Cullen328

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Squigle ducky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

[[Wikipedia:Autoblock|Autoblocked]] because your IP address was recently used by "[[User:Squigle ducky|Squigle ducky]]". The reason given for Squigle ducky's block is: "[[WP:Vandalism-only account|Vandalism-only account]]".

Blocking administrator: ‪Cullen328‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Not autoblocked, you are directly blocked for vandalism. Hard to debate the block given this edit and this one. Yamla (talk) 19:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]