User talk:Squigish

Welcome!

Hello Squigish, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! EdwinHJ | Talk 06:08, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Hookah

I didn't mean it to be spam. I think the movement is still small enough that it hasn't become synonymous with Social Smoke. With more media coverage, it might be popular enough that a 100% American company that makes these Oriental smoking tools would be appropriate to put into the hookah article. They're based out of Dallas Texas and their manufacturing is in Austin, Texas.

Wesleyan, Theater, Jorge Luis Borges

I realize that you're in Seattle, but I thought that you might be interested to know that this April, Wesleyan is producing a senior thesis play based on the stories of Jorge Luis Borges, called "Labyrinths." Squigish 23:02, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Kind of amusing. Back when I was there they didn't know from Borges. Latin American literature got no respect in the early 1970s. I have my very ethnically diverse high school and its very good Spanish department to thank for my interest in Borges. During college, I used to buy Borges books (mostly in the original) in Boston & New York; to the best of my recollection, none were for sale at Atticus.

I never took any Spanish classes at Wesleyan, so it's possible that he was being taught in that department, but that department was, itself, quite condescended to. I remember being put down by would-be intellectuals among my classmates because I hadn't learned an "academically useful" language in high school. -- Jmabel | Talk 02:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flagging page for bias

The Noor Jehan page seems to have become someone's attempt at writing flowery biography. However, I'm not familiar enough yet with Wikipedia's norms to just do a big edit on it myself. What is the best way to handle this situation? --SnappingTurtle

Help with formatting problems

I just added a picture to the page about Emily's Reasons Why Not. There was already an infobox in that page, and with the two of them together they don't format quite right. Can you direct me to a resource for fixing the problem? --SnappingTurtle

Looks like you've taken care of it. --Squigish 19:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby

I am still getting to grips with Vandalproof. This might be the reason some vandal got trough the cracks, or your reverted something I tried to revert but ended up reverting yours. Sorry for that. Havok (T/C/c) 16:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This one apparently does. Removed the warning and I'll try and be more careful next time. Havok (T/C/c) 16:19, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Safaricom

Just a friendly reminder to use an edit summary when proposing deletion for an article. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{prod}} tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks! Also, please give a reason when you add the prod tag to an article. Thanks again! Mango juice^talk 13:56, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you asked. Check out Wikipedia:Introduction to Deletion Process, that should set you straight. The short answer is, prod and afd are not the same. If something is obviously, no question, non-notable, and non-notable in a category the community agrees on (like biographies of people, or articles on bands or companies), or if the article is blatantly inappropriate, prod is a good choice. But prod specifically avoids debate, on the basis of the article's deletion being assumed to be non-controversial. A lot of articles like that do get created; check out 8 Ugly for an example of what I consider an ideal type of article to prod. AfD on the other hand, can be found at WP:AFD, and posts deletion nominations publically for about a week, while the community tries to form consensus about their deletion. Mango juice^talk 04:51, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi, I worked on the SNAP-25 page [and some other newly created pages on syntaxin, synaptotagmin, SNARE (protein)], you may check it now. Danko Georgiev MD 09:14, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for defending my user page! Jacek Kendysz 21:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ST-VOY Drone.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ST-VOY Drone.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

I noticed the message you recently left to User talk:Aquishix. Please remember: do not bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 19:08, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Squigish! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:23, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Squigish,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Squigish. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Squigish. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Squigish. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]