User talk:SquealingPig

Stop vandalising. are you a sockpuppet. If so your real identity will be punished for it, --SqueakBox 18:15, May 5, 2005 (UTC)

No. It is you who will be blocked. SquealingPig

Que tal Madrid? --SqueakBox 18:25, May 5, 2005 (UTC)

Very well.

I believe SquealingPig is a Wikipedia:Sockpuppet of Zapatancas (talk · contribs) --SqueakBox 19:44, May 5, 2005 (UTC)

blocked as a sockpuppet created for the purpose of annoying another user. dab (ᛏ) 18:43, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

==Relation to Zapatancas== *Here Zapatancas reverts SqueakBox for the first time at Zapatero's years as an opposition leader as of 09:35, May 5, 2005.

Here as of 10:23, May 5, 2005 Zapatancas reverts a huge amount of SqueakBox's work at José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero.
Here as of 10:47, May 5, 2005 SquealingPig comes along making a simple statement that betrays his non native English speaking origins.
Here as of 10:54, May 5, 2005 squeakBox responds in a civil manner *Here as of 11:00, May 5, 2005 SqueakBox reverts Zapatero's years as an opposition leader back to being a redirect. Instead of debating or reverting.
Here as of 12:02, May 5, 2005 SquealingPig vandalises SqueakBox's user page, and then proceeds to do so another 7 times
here
here
here
here
here
here
and here.

He was then blocked and has now been permanently blocked. It simply is not credible that this nasty troll was not Zapatancas, who already had 2 accounts (Zapatero and Zapatancas, though Zapatancas is nopt a sock of Zapatero), the language used is the same and he has kept up the virulenmt hatred towards me ever since, SqueakBox 15:25, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,

Incidentally, how is a blocked user supposed to 'add evidence to the evidence sub-page' or 'contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page'? Cynical 21:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He has already contributed amply, indeed it was he who brought the case to the arbcom. Please dont clutter this page with silly questions, SqueakBox 02:19, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]