User talk:SquarePeg89

This is SquarePeg89's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: People-centered Justice (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:People-centered Justice and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I'm not sure why you rejected this article. The concept of people-centered justice is not new or a neologism. It had been used for over five years in work on access to justice.

Moreover, the article uses a range of sources from different websites. SquarePeg89 (talk) 18:10, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SquarePeg89, then you should add some more background on how the term came about. Who coined it, when and where? How did it become popular? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:27, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Research papers don't show worldwide notability for the term. You need external news sources that show the widespread use of the term. You can reference OECD conference from 2022 and this article https://www.americanbar.org/advocacy/rule_of_law/blog/roli-people-centered-justice-programming-1122/ But it will need more. Also how is it different from People-centered development which has an article here already. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused - why would the ABA Roli page be better than the more original sources that I quoted - including the 2018 OECD conference and the Justice for All report - which both precede the conference you mention?

I have added a mention of people-centered development and some other uses of 'people-centered', but I'm not sure this actually clarifies anything, so I don't know what to do about that. SquarePeg89 (talk) 22:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SquarePeg89! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: People-centered Justice (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Vaurie was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:People-centered Justice and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:People-centered Justice

Hello, SquarePeg89. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:People-centered Justice, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:People-centered Justice

Hello, SquarePeg89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "People-centered Justice".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]