User talk:Spyrides

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Welcome!

Hello, Spyrides, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - N (talk) 00:41, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bryanpoprobson whu.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Qwghlm 23:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page Blanking

On 25-Jan, you blanked John Dick (II). Blanking pages is generally considered a bad idea. I've reverted it to the previous version. If this was the result of a broken edit, you may wish to make the correct edits. If you believe the page should be deleted, please follow the deletion procedures. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 14:40, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also applies to John Dick (1950s footballer). A redirect from a page move should normally be left in place. In certain cases, it might make sense to delete, but redirects are cheap. -- JLaTondre 15:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you decided to ask for deletion. Unfortunetly, they should have been listed at Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion instead of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. It's easy to make that mistake as WP:DEL isn't the clearest. Most times admins will close out a redirect listed at AfD, but other times they'll let it go through. -- JLaTondre 02:13, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I moved both of them to WP:RFD for you. You may find them and vote there. Chick Bowen 02:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

West Ham

Re: Squad list. Information such as date signed and previous club is available on the players page, the official squad list looks neater and also reduces the page size.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Football_squad_player And it took me a good 20 minutes to convert the squad! Elzar 19:13, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Stevenson (footballer)

The book I have (Arsenal Who's Who, ISBN 1899429034) gives short bios of every player for Arsenal and Woolwich Arsenal; it says he only played the first seven League matches of the season and was then dropped, and doesn't mention anything about the captaincy - and it usually does say if a player was captain of the club. In addition, around that time Joe Powell played for Arsenal, and he was captain during 1893-94, and remained a regular in the side until his untimely death in 1896. In addition, this list of Arsenal captains [1] (mistakenly labelled Chelsea, but all the players on there are from Arsenal) doesn't include Stevenson (but does include Powell). It's possible Stevenson was captain, but he was only at Arsenal for a short time and neither of the two sources I use say that he was, which is why I have my doubts.

Possible solution - say he was captain according to Dickford & Gibson, but provide a footnote saying no mention of this is made in Harris & Hogg. What do you reckon? Qwghlm 15:34, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. To be fair, a lot of football history from pre-1900 is pretty murky, so I'm not surprised if there are conflicting sources. Anyway, I've added the footnote in now. Qwghlm 16:16, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thames Ironworks v. Woolwich Arsenal

I'm afraid I drew a bit of a blank: I had a check of my archives - my list of results has no record of Arsenal playing Thames Ironworks in 1896 - according to that we didn't play them until a friendly on April 26 1898 (which ended 2-2). According to the fixture list I have, Woolwich Arsenal played Casuals on March 2 1896 (winning 4-1) and Tottenham Hotspur on March 16 1896 (losing 1-3 :-( ). So if the match did happen then it's slightly more likely it was played on the earlier date - even then, it was rare for a team to play twice in one day!

The only 5-3 friendly scorelines that happened to Arsenal that decade were against Chatham on April 2, 1892 and Stoke City on September 4 1899. My list of results is by no means complete and it's entirely possible Arsenal did play that match but it was an unofficial fixture (especially as it was floodlit), or just didn't get recorded. Sorry I couldn't be of more help - I'll bear it in mind the next time I go through my old books, though. Qwghlm 20:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Western League

Hi mate, this was pretty much all I could find on the Western League (copied from my reply to Lion King). Have you found anything?

I can't find anything too official that mentions it. There is this page that records it:

1906-07 Western League Division 1B Champions. Overall Champions after beating Division 1A Champions Fulham 1-0 at Chelsea (15 April 1907)

I'm pretty sure that'll have been the reserve team. Our progression into the Football League started through the Southern League Second Division, which we joined in 1899. We moved to the Southern League First Division the following year but stayed there for yonks. We came fifth in the Southern League First Division in 1907. That page doesn't mention this, but the reserves page does. I think they have that the wrong way round. There is also a page for West Ham United "A" just to confuse matters. This page of spud results shows that the Western League ran concurrently with the Southern League, with some matches being played a couple of days apart. The Wikipedia page states that:

In the years before the Second World War, many teams played in both the Southern and Western Leagues; the Western League was considered as subservient to the Southern League.

The list of champions does show a number of other clubs that fielded reserve teams in the league.
- N (talk) 23:07, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted articles

Latish last night I came across a series of one-line articles on old and apparently short-lived football teams, one of which didn't mention the title in the article ("Vampires FC"), and which were all created with a jokey (though obscure) and uninformative edit summary. My thought was that, first, they were a hoax, and secondly, they were in any case very, very short articles that made no claim to the significance of their subjects (which, in fact, seemed more to assert their insignificance).

When I came to the fourth, I began to wonder if they weren't in fact serious, and held off until I'd had a chance to investigate further. If genuine, I still believe that they belong in one article (perhaps a list?), unless they really are individually significant and can be expanded with genuine information (which seems unlikely, from what I saw). At the moment, though, they're little more than entries in a ~~trainspotter's~~ football-team spotter's notebook.

What I should have done was check on their creator, and see whether he or she was likely to be a hoaxer or not — but if you've ever patrolled the New pages section, you'll know that of every fifty entries up to a half can be either straightforward vandalism, blatant copyvios, unformatted but possibly useful articles, etc., all needing attention, and that makes it hard to do a thorough check on all of them. Sorry for not doing it, though. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:02, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused categories

Hi. It seems you made several positional categories, and decided to abandon them:

Should they be deleted, per the WP:CFD conventions? Regards. Neier 07:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your user boxes

Using copyrighted images in user boxes is not part of the fair use claim. You should remove them. ed g2s • talk 21:58, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quick thanks

Erm, apologies if I'm not meant to write this here but I just wanted to thank you for expanding George Hilsdon's entry. He's my great great grandad you see. I started the article a long time ago and was shocked to see it had now become a fully fledged piece of prose. Many thanks!

Ashley Hilsdon

Jimmy Collins

Hi mate, could you double-check your appearance stats for Jimmy Collins please. The Book says 336 in all comps (311 league, 25 cup) and has a breakdown by season. The appearance records page has him down as 326.. Ta. Nzd (talk) 15:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, another discrepancy (just a little one). Stan Foxall is listed as scoring 62 war-time goals, whereas the book says 63 ("in 156 league and cup matches"). Also, could you add your ref to the John Dick article (and remove the tag) please. Cheers. Nzd (talk) 14:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, and the other, er, discrepancy is George Furnell, who is listed as David Furnell in the Who's Who book. I expect both are right, with one or other as a middle name that he was more often known as. I've added a note for now.. - Nzd (talk) 23:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that ref tag on the West Ham United F.C. 1988-1989 page. Could you add refs for those season pages when you get a chance please. There aren't any listed from 1922-1923 on. Also, I'm thinking of standardising the names of the season pages; any objection to me moving them to West Ham United F.C. seasons for the main page, and West Ham United F.C. season 1922-23, etc. for the individual pages? Thanks mate. - Nzd (talk) 13:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was me ;) I'll try to standardise the format, to make them look a bit more like the others in Category:English football club seasons in time. - Nzd (talk) 16:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to AC Omonia

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Spyrides! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 20:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History of West Ham United F.C.

Hello there. I noticed you've been putting up an awful lot of information regarding West Ham during the early parts of the century and was wondering what your sources were (books, web, etc) as I attempt to flesh out the History of West Ham United F.C. from what I started last year and could use some such texts.--Koncorde 20:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for the links. Lalamy is superb, have used it myself a lot. Will give the other books a look up. Cheers.--Koncorde 23:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you don't mind, lifted a few bits and pieces from your Castle Swifts article, and will probably be halfinching a bit more as I flesh out the early history with a little more about Thames Ironworks (I have cited your main articles and year by year analysis at the beginning and end of relevant sections). Would welcome your input anyways!--Koncorde 22:47, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Funnily enough I ordered that book the day before last! Kowinkydink.--Koncorde 19:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

West Ham United F.C. 2007-2008

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on West Ham United F.C. 2007-2008, by PeeJay2K3 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because West Ham United F.C. 2007-2008 fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

because the subject matter is non-notable and can be found on any football website

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting West Ham United F.C. 2007-2008, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate West Ham United F.C. 2007-2008 itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Crouch End Vampires F.C.

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A {{prod}} template has been placed on Crouch End Vampires F.C., by Number 57 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}.

Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Grim Reaper Bot 07:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style for club season articles

As you have often contribute to club season articles, I believe this and this are pretty much of your interest.--ClaudioMB 16:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:44, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Official West Ham United Dream Team

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Official West Ham United Dream Team, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Official West Ham United Dream Team. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. – Pee Jay 10:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Spyrides! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Brian Robson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb ps header

Template:Fb ps header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Spyrides. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Spyrides. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]