User talk:Springs24

Springs24, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Springs24! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2020 United States Senate election in Maine without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 331dot (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from edit-warring, which is defined as repeatedly adding or removing information. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Please read the policy before making further edits.--User:Namiba 18:21, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please cut it out Generaluser11 (talk) 22:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Generaluser11: No, you need to cut out brazenly violating an Rfc. The threshold is an average of 5% in polling which Savage doesn’t satisfy. You clearly have a conflict of interest or personal bias here. Springs24 (talk) 23:50, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. User:Namiba 19:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (2020 United States Senate election in Maine) for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Salvio

20:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Springs24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This was a simple content dispute, and the page was left in the new version that’s clearly in violation of a prior RFC on infobox criteria. At the very least, the page should br protected and returned to its original form. User:Generaluser11 reverted as many times as me.

Decline reason:

You're a sock. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:49, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Now you're being imprecise; here's how that edit war went:
As you can see, Generaluser11 has not reverted as many times as you. Furthermore, thinking you are right does not excuse edit warring and, in any case, I have only issued a partial block, so that you can still discuss the isse on the talk page. $Salvio$ 09:53, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]