User talk:Spring 857

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Spring_857.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Spring 857 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I attached a ^{[not in citation given]} tag to a statement in the wiki's article about the Prophet Muhammad, and an admin censoring the article responded quickly by blocking my account indefinitely and removing the tags. The two sources attached to the statement have nothing to do with it. Anyone can check these two sources and find out that they don't say what that statement says. Thus, tagging them was not disruptive in any way. Actually, tagging them was constructive and aiming at improving the content of the article. The abusive admin is clearly WP:NOTHERE to improve the article but to block any genuine Muslim trying to remove the falsification of sources from it. This fact stands side by side with the fact that the disruptive editors who made this falsification of the sources went without blocking, while I (the one who tried to correct that disruption) was blocked.--Spring 857 (talk) 13:28, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Great story, but I see a different story when I look at your brief contribution history. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:03, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ohnoitsjamie: I rejected your decline because I didn't request an intervention from another abusive admin. I know very well how the corrupt admins of English wiki actively support each other like a gang of WP:MEAT instead of standing out firmly for the ones who are being wronged. I registered in 19 Jan 2016, so what would any mature reasonable person expect to see in my contribution history. Of course my contribution history would be brief and this is quite normal. The question is was the edit after which my account got blocked a disruptive edit? That is the question that you needed to answer and you could not answer.

I request the intervention of the upstanding admins - in case they exist here - to unblock my account because I was wronged.--Spring 857 (talk) 15:08, 3 February 2016 (UTC).}}[reply]

Per this policy, you don't get to remove declined unblock requests, though you may make additional ones. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't remove your decline if it was based on reason or if it has addressed the issue or if it has answered the question "was the edit after which my account got blocked a disruptive edit?" but since your decline was entirely per WP:MEAT, I am entitled to reject it.--Spring 857 (talk) 15:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While you are permitted to remove other comments from your talk page as you did here, the warning still stands regarding removal of declined unblocks. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]