User talk:Spreadingwisdom

This is Spreadingwisdom's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Happy Hours Entertainments (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Happy Hours Entertainments and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Happy Hours Entertainments, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 12:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spreadingwisdom! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 12:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Happy Hours Entertainments

Hello, Spreadingwisdom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Happy Hours Entertainments".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 11:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:53, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Spreadingwisdom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I found my account blocked since July 2019 for for abusing multiple accounts. I never tried to inject wrong or false content in Wikipedia so far. I never made too many contributions too because I know whatever content we add to Wikipedia must have sources. two fresh articles I contributed to Wikipedia was about filmmakers "Sarath Kottikkal" and "Ashraf Hamza". whatever content I added was completely true and these two are well known personalities in their area. I had provided minimum 4 to 5 references to support the article. But after few days both articles were removed from Wikipedia and I got this warning. I have made small contributions before and they were fine and still existing in the Wikipedia. Kindly review my complaint and restore both articles if you found I am not guilty. Thank You. Spreadingwisdom (talk) 08:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for the block at all, which is abuse of multiple accounts. This is a checkuser block, meaning that there is technical evidence to support it as well. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Spreadingwisdom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank You for your quick response. I went through what is a checkuser block. I have used two or more accounts from same IP address. I think that's the reason. Initially I had one account which later I stopped using long back. Then after some time, I thought of contributing content to Wikipedia, mainly in films, since I am connected with the industry. Then I started this account. From both the accounts I never spammed or used accounts for monetary benefits. If you check my contributions, I hope everything will be clear. I didn't knew about this multiple account from same IP will be a problem. I had also made slight little contributions when I was not logged in. I never thought these things will be a big issue. If you lift the block I will only use the present account. Infact I forgot the details of the past account. I am sure I never used the past account and present account at the same time. In that case, I am guilty. But I don't think, that's happened. Kindly review my request and give me a chance. Kindly consider my post ban behaviour also. I never tried to edit or modify any content after ban or initiated any community standard violence's too. Thank You Spreadingwisdom (talk) 09:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.