User talk:Sportmania7

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Criticisms of the present age eligibility rules in women's figure skating, tennis, and gymnastics, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Criticisms of the present age eligibility rules in women's figure skating, tennis, and gymnastics was changed by Sportmania7 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939945 on 2010-11-21T12:59:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:59, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revoking articles

Regarding your desire to delete the article you created, Criticisms of the present age eligibility rules in women's figure skating, tennis, and gymnastics: because of Wikipedia's licensing, editors generally cannot revoke their contributions. When you add material to Wikipedia you release it under a GDFL license, which means you are allowing other people to edit it. See Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Revocation of our licensing is not permitted. The procedure to have an article you created deleted is normally to add a speedy deletion template such as {{db-userreq}} to the article, but that only applies when the article has not been edited by others; your article has been edited by several other people (see editing history), so it is not "your property". rʨanaɢ (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that yet again you have changed the name of your own volition without consent. Wikipedia are about to delete the article and I have emailed them again in response to their kind email putting in a complaint about you and requesting that your account be suspended as you are evidently determined to impose your views on others as a kind of sockpuppet. Do not dare even contemplate changing the name back again or mess with this article again - Sportmania7

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:10, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Criticisms of age regulations in sports. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. If you believe an editor is using sockpuppets, the appropriate course is to open a sockpuppet investigation, NOT to continue to post allegations on article talkpages. Do not do so again. Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]