User talk:Sportcrazy123

March 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

ST47 (talk) 23:48, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

notice:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sportcrazy123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven’t been given a clear reason for why I have been blocked. Sportcrazy123 (talk) 23:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only, not an unblock request. The reason is both given above and in the block log(which you can also see in the red box that appears when you edit this page). This is a checkuser block, meaning there is technical evidence to support it. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 03:20, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reason for the block is exactly what it says on the tin - that based on confidential WP:Checkuser evidence, you are clearly WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia. ST47 (talk) 04:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ST47: I can see the reason now why I have been blocked: “Reporter blocked for obviously being some sort of troll. I don't know what Rlax 1's deal is, but the notion that Betty Logan has created a sock to revert one IP vandal is simply absurd.”

I think the rationale given for dismissing my suggestion on a potential link between Rlax 1 and Betty Logan is lacking due consideration. The Rlax 1 account was created to immediately revert a comment directed at Betty Logan and no other activity has taken place on the account since. Logic would suggest that Rlax 1 is a sock puppet of Betty Logan. Unfortunately I can’t comment further on the sock puppet investigations page because I have been labelled a ‘troll’ for raising a genuine concern. This page is available at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Betty Logan/Archive

@Stwalkerster: Please can you provide an impartial view and run an IP check on the users Betty Logan and Relax 1. If there is no connection I will go away quietly. Sportcrazy123 (talk) 08:36, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think Stwalkerster is busy as they haven’t been particularly active over the past few days. @Bbb23 I’d be grateful if you could run an IP check on the users Betty Logan and Relax 1 to identify whether there has been sock puppetry. Sportcrazy123 (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Sportcrazy123 (talk) 18:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Can you please provide insight? I need a check user to run an IP search to confirm whether the users Betty Logan and Relax 1 are connected and if there has been sock puppetry, with appropriate action taken if there is a positive match. I originally raised this issue for sock puppetry investigations but feel it was unduly dismisses without appropriate further investigation. See further above for more detail if needed. Sportcrazy123 (talk) 16:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Username: @Username: @Username: @Username: @Username: @Username: @Username: @Username: @Username: @Username: @Username:

Alison, Berean Hunter, Ivanvector, L235, Materialscientist, MusikAnimal, Mz7, NinjaRobotPirate, Ponyo, Reaper Eternal, ST47, Stwalkerster, SQL, TonyBallioni, Versageek, Zzuuzz Sportcrazy123 (talk) 18:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Betty Logan sock puppetry investigation

I have raised a sock puppetry investigation into the users Betty Logan and Relax 1. This page is available at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Betty Logan/Archive

The investigation has been closed. However, I think the rationale given for dismissing my suggestion on a potential link between Rlax 1 and Betty Logan is lacking due consideration. As explained in the investigation page referred to above, an edit was made to the page Return to Never Land at 10.40 on 7 March 2020. This edit was made as an act of vandalism in an apparent protest to repeated edits made by another user called Betty Logan. The edit was made to explicitly refer to Betty Logan (“Betty Logan says that”), who has previously made a series of edits to the page. At 17.17 the user called Rlax 1 was created. At 17.18 Rlax 1 undid the reversion on the Return to Never Land page. No further edits have since been made by Relax 1. This activity is not consistent with a new account and suggests that Rlax 1 is a sock puppet of Betty Logan.

Unfortunately, my concerns were dismissed without any IP checks taking place between Betty Logan and Relax 1. I can’t comment further and raise my concerns on the sock puppet investigations page because I have been labelled a ‘troll’ and blocked for raising a genuine concern.

Please can someone perform an IP check to confirm whether the users Betty Logan and Relax 1 are connected and if there has been sock puppetry, with appropriate action taken if there is a positive match. If not then I will go away quietly.

@Alison: @Berean Hunter: @Ivanvector: @L235: @MusikAnimal: @Ponyo: @Reaper Eternal: @Mz7: @NinjaRobotPirate: @SQL: @TonyBallioni: @Versageek: @Zzuuzz:

@Betty Logan: You might want to put forward your defence before you get blocked. Sportcrazy123 (talk) 18:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]