User talk:Spoonkymonkey

Please place a permanent block on this account, with the notation that it is something I asked for. I have better things to do with my time than be bullied and harassed on Wikipedia. Please also archive my talk page. You might want to keep this in mind: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:The_Rise_and_Decline You might also want to consider the well-known sexism of Wikipedia, and take a good, long look at the shaming of Rachel Marsden for more than a decade. Goodbye. Spoonkymonkey (talk) 19:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page archive: User talk:Spoonkymonkey/Archive

So long, hope this is just a wikibreak

Thanks for the fish Video
So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish
Illegitimi non carborundum 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:41, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:18, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeal

If this was indeed you: you'll need to contact the arbcom to get any issues with your current block resolved since I don't have any knowledge of what new account(s) you used and what it/they were used for. One advice though: don't create any more accounts or edit wikipedia as an IP in the meantime. That will only compound the problem and make any unblock more unlikely. Use the email address in the block notice instead. Abecedare (talk) 22:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Midland Free Press

The article Midland Free Press has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2011. I was unable to find sources using Google, Google News, or Google Books.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. casualdejekyll 18:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]