This is an archive of past discussions about User:SpigotMap. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Please stop. If you continue to removing the images on the Pokemon movies pages you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Workadded (talk • contribs)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war with the seperate pages for the according to the reverts you have made on Dialga VS Palkia VS Darkrai. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors.
These unsigned warnings are from a troll who is angry that he can't randomly add items not important to an article. SpigotMap06:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to removing the images on the Pokemon movies pages you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Workadded (talk • contribs)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove a image notice from an article you created, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Workadded (talk • contribs)
August 2007
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pokémon Heroes. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. You need warned first, usually.Angus Lepper(T, C, D)11:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Also, in reference to your note on the other user's page: it might be worth familiarising yourself with the difference between a ban and a block. Quickly: a ban means that you are not considered included in the invitation to "edit this page"; your edits may be reverted with impunity; a block simply means that you technically cannot edit Wikipedia because action has been taken to disable your editing privileges on an account or IP address(es). A ban may be enforced with a block, but they are not the same thing. Angus Lepper(T, C, D)12:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
The images are important...The images are releated to the article. The japanese poster shows the difference with the american poster, and the pikachu the movie logo show the changes throughout each movie, the logo for the third movie has the release date for japan ex: Pikachu the Movie 2000, and the fourth logo has 2001 the year the fourth movie was released, and the fifth one has Pikachu the Movie 5th which is the fifth movie, and the tenth movie has Pikachu the Movie 10th which is the tenth movie.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Workadded (talk • contribs)
Thank you kind sir. It is unfortunate that we had to get ourselves blocked before the situation was fixed. A consensus has been reached within the Pokemon Project so this shouldn't happen again. SpigotMap07:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Spam warning
Hi, you used {{uw-spam3}} to give User:Kids for Kids her first warning for adding external links. The user seems to be a very respectable person and has sent an apology to OTRS. I just wanted to point out that {{uw-spam3}} is too intimidating for a new user -- you should have used {{uw-spam1}}. {{uw-spam3}} should be given only when the user has already been warned, but continues spamming even after the warning.
In this case, the user was just trying to be helpful, and didn't realize that adding such links are against the external links guideline. I've explained the external links guideline to the user by e-mail. The username seems to be affiliated with an organization (Kids for Kids, so I've also asked the owner to abandon the username, and create a new account or change the username.
While Me Myself or I's addition was perhaps a bit detailed, a description of game mechanics, especially when the mechanics are particularly novel and not derivative from a well-known game, does not deserve to be categorized as a game guide, and certainly not as spam. I'm concerned that you broke 3RR, but I'll assume good faith.
I do not edit Yohoho! Puzzle Pirates due to concerns about my own ability to have NPOV given that I work on the game myself, but I thought I'd make my views known.
I was reverting the hoards of vandalism coming in. After looking over the article, the blacksmith addition does not appear to be different then the other sections in the article, but it brings to view that the entire article appears to be pushing the limits of a Game Guide. SpigotMap10:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war with the seperate pages for the according to the reverts you have made on Dialga VS Palkia VS Darkrai. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pokémon Heroes. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. You need warned first, usually. Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 11:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)