User talk:SpiceChat

Hello, Aeasinc. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 01:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 01:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

SpiceChat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

SpiceChat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

They were voted best in Brooklyn last year but seems like it was not added. So I was just adding that piece of information. There was nothing been sold or advertisedBrooklynite (talk) 02:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

globally renamed Aeasinc to SpiceChat. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:02, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

adding that piece of information . . .nothing been sold or advertised

Well, that's probably why this is just a username block, though it's clear from user name "Aeasinc " that there is a WP:COI. I hope you used a source unconnected with the subject. If you, for instance, used the company's web site, that's not suitable. All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking. Though it is possible to be promoting the subject without selling or advertising a particular product. Will proceed with the rename.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:58, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed Aeasinc to SpiceChat

globally renamed Aeasinc to SpiceChat.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected the source.--