User talk:Spencer1594

May 2020

Could you make a statement about why you think this is right, over here? ☆ Bri (talk) 02:43, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I check the Template of the Country's that I think some people was recovered from Covid-19 Spencer1594 (talk) 16:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to copy your reply to the talkpage so more people can be involved in consensus building. Conversation may be continued there. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recoveries and hospitalizations

Hi, can you please give a source for the numbers you added to the cases by state? They do not appear in the referenced sources (we get our data almost exclusively from the official state reports, and most states do not release recovery and/or hospitalization data). Also, when adding numbers to the rec or hosp columns you MUST wrap any values greater than 999 with {{nts|NUMBER GOES HERE}} otherwise that column won't sort properly. That said, we really appreciate any help updating numbers, so if you are interested in contributing more you can check the table against the cited references and update whenever you see a discrepancy. Thanks! JoelleJay (talk) 00:46, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I click the Country name and saw the cases and the recovery click the Country to check the numbers Spencer1594 (talk) 01:02, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spencer, changes like this and similar changes on WP:COVIDWA [1] are considered original research. Please reconsider. Two people now have questioned it. It's becoming disruptive. Especially when you are aware of the issue and simply revert without comment. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We are asking you where you are finding these numbers and to properly cite them if you feel they should be included. You are updating state counts, so your previous responses about clicking country names(?) do not make sense. Some of your edits are also completely illogical; how can Illinois have 98,000 cases and 4,300 deaths but only have 2 recoveries and 4,000 hospitalizations? Bri and I have been diplomatic with your editing behavior so far but if this continues you may get a warning about being disruptive. JoelleJay (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have found a source that Snohomish has recovered and here's a link below https://www.heraldnet.com/news/virusupdate/ And I click the Country name and The Pages are updated Spencer1594 (talk) 23:46, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And now a third editor agrees you can’t portray the state data this way. I really hope you stop now. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay so did you click the link about Snohomish case's? Spencer1594 (talk) 03:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter. You can't extrapolate from some of the counties to the entire state. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and Spencer1594 (talk) 20:27, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found a New source for Washington that the Snohomish country have 1,770 recovery and here a source below https://www.heraldnet.com/news/virusupdate/ Spencer1594 (talk) 20:29, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure you are either trolling me or unable to converse meaningfully. Goodbye. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a trolling that Evidence to show that Snohomish have recovery didn't you click the source? Spencer1594 (talk) 20:35, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard / your COVID data editing

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COVID general sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Johnuniq (talk) 01:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Spencer1594: The effect of the above is that from now on, any challenged edits relating to the topic of COVID-19 must be discussed. Repeating any similar edits without consensus will result in escalating blocks. Johnuniq (talk) 01:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]