User talk:Speedything

Chris Eubank

If you feel you could face it again I'd appreciate your help in improving the article over the next week or so. We wont be hearing from Mr I P Reverter. --LiamE 14:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Atkins

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

The reason the user keeps removing the content you are adding is not because it is poorly source, they are removing it because it does not belong in Personal Life, therefore stop attempting to place it in personal life. Further violation of the revert rule and disruptive editing may result in a block. Please try to solve conflicts peacefully. Chieftain Tartarus (talk) 11:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for making this clear Chieftain Tartarus. I was being reverted without any reasons being given. Have now edited the article to comply with this suggestion.