User talk:Speedystickd

Archives

--Hi, feel free to leave a message.--

Please help Abercrombie & Fitch win the Article Improvement Drive

I noticed that you actively participate in Wikipedia:Article Creation and Improvement Drive. Please, please vote for Abercrombie & Fitch. It is such a big and long-running company, yet the quality of the article is yet embarassing. Your help is greatly appreciated. mirageinred 01:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thank you for voting =) mirageinred 23:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Microorganism as this week's WP:AID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Microorganism was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

Davodd 03:04, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Pluto as this week's WP:AID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Pluto was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

Davodd 20:03, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Mark Twain as this week's WP:AID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Mark Twain was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

_→AzaToth 00:18, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Coffee as this week's WP:AID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Coffee was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

– Clockwork Soul 04:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Menino

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Hiberniantears 19:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright question regarding history section of Queen's University

I noticed from this edit [1] that you added almost the entire history section of this article. Today, another user has tagged this section with a copyright violation tag (see [2] for text from Queen's University site). I was just wondering if, by chance, you had permission from the Queen's University Secretariat to use this text on Wikipedia, or, if you can assist in some way of clarifying the copyright issue in this section. If you can help, please post a response on the talk page of Queen's University. Thanks in advance. κaτaʟaveno^T_C 00:57, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tricky situation, no doubt...I wonder if placing the copyright violation here onto the discussion page would be of any use? And there is little deails on early folks in the Queen's College history. Surely some more info is available, that won't break copyright!

Bacl-presby 21:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Queen's University current events" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Queen's University current events. Since you had some involvement with the Queen's University current events redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. feminist (talk) 07:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]