User talk:Speedydixon1997

Welcome!

Hello, Speedydixon1997, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

August 2017

Reddogsix Do you get a kick out of doing this? Get off on it maybe? You are a truly sad individual to go around and flag everything I have uploaded.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Reddogsix. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 03:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NO.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Reddogsix, you may be blocked from editing. reddogsix (talk) 03:32, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kenny Miller. reddogsix (talk) 03:33, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SHUT IT REDDUGBAWS

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism, as you did at Kieran Tierney. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:54, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Speedydixon1997 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

WE NEED PATRICK ROBERTS BACK Speedydixon1997 (talk) 03:56, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Block extended to indefinite. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 05:20, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Add to the block reasons the streams of insults and incivility. Also, making nonsense requests for unblock can result in your block being extended.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]