Jump to content

User talk:SpeedyGonzales1488

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpeedyGonzales1488 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello? I am on a shared network so I may be getting caught up in a block

Decline reason:

Given the level of disruption from that IP and other associated abuse, we cannot unblock it at this time. Kuru (talk) 13:59, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What, precisely, does the block message say? MER-C 09:09, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it says "Editing from 20.138.2.51 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪Yamla‬ for the following reason(s): Block evasion: Converted back from anon-only after further threats from sockpuppet accounts; see User talk:UrbanScion" - I would be lying if I said I knew what a lot of wikipedia-speak means but what is a sockpuppet? An alternate account?SpeedyGonzales1488 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not unblock this without checking with a checkuser. There's a long-term vandal operating from this address. --Yamla (talk) 12:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note also that "1488" is a hate symbol. See Fourteen Words and WP:NONAZIS. --Yamla (talk) 13:48, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpeedyGonzales1488 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sorry but I didn't know that, I had heard the number and it was catchy in my head. I can create a new account with a different number if you prefer? And has there been any vandalism from this IP lately? I logged out to check and I haven't seen a contribution since Feb 2018?

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 14:49, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpeedyGonzales1488 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not the vandal, though! I am on a shared network

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notice of noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Move to ban Zombiedude101z". Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 11:14, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]