User talk:Speakingofcities

Thank you for your edits to the page on the University of Northampton, and it is good to see that some one is improving the accuracy of this article. I have noticed that on your userpage you say that your hope is that "more scholars" can get involved with Wikipedia; I have similar views myself, hoping that Wikipedia can escape the frequent charge of being over-laden with articles on popular and media culture at the expense of in-depth study of academic subjects. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 10:17, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind words; I actually work at Northampton (perhaps you do too?) so I'm keen to see it accurately represented. The same applies to the other articles I've edited on subjects that (hopefully!) I know something about. Speakingofcities (talk) 14:32, 23 January 2010 (UTC) Thank you - yes, I am actually on the pay roll at the University of Northampton, where I am employed as one of the lecturing staff. By the way, I was the person who put the information about Ann Tait on the talk page of the University of Northampton article - I know she will be resigning in the near future, but I do not think any one knows who will succeed her as yet. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:46, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:SCAPE logo.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SCAPE logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scandinavian Association for Pollination Ecology (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scandinavian Association for Pollination Ecology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 20:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Speakingofcities, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cerebellum (talk) 20:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SCAPE

Hello! Thanks for the SCAPE article! Unfortunately, the only sources I could find for it are the websites for past SCAPE meetings, which are not independent of the subject and so cannot be used to show notability. Are there any third-party sources discusisng SCAPE? They don't have to be in English. --Cerebellum (talk) 21:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Scandinavian Association for Pollination Ecology concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Scandinavian Association for Pollination Ecology, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Scandinavian Association for Pollination Ecology

Hello, Speakingofcities. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Scandinavian Association for Pollination Ecology".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cahk (talk) 04:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]