User talk:Spdslecturer

Spdslecturer, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Spdslecturer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:10, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Removing information

Hi! I've noticed some edits where you've removed valid detail without an Edit Summary and/or marked the edit as minor (example) . This is not a constructive way to change articles and may be construed as vandalism. When removing detail on an article please provide a brief edit summary explaining why that edit has been made (e.g. "information was incorrect") and be sure to provide a source that supports your edits. Thanks! SFB 10:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Alexf^(talk) 15:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week from certain pages (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Max Arosev and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Max Arosev/Archive) for attempting to delete the ongoing investigation, twice.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.